🧪
hypothesis

C1q shows synapse-class-specific roles, with inhibitory versus excitatory synapses exhibiting different susceptibility to C1q-associated elimination

Hypothesis

C1q shows synapse-class-specific roles, with inhibitory versus excitatory synapses exhibiting different susceptibility to C1q-associated elimination

This hypothesis is biologically plausible and potentially important for circuit-level phenotypes, but current support is stronger for contextual selectivity than for distinct intrinsic C1q biochemical programs at inhibitory versus excita.
🧬 C1QA,C1QB,C1QC,GAD1,GAD2,SLC6A1,SLC17A7,ITGAM,ITGB2🩺 neurodegeneration🎯 Composite 53%💱 $0.53▼0.3%proposed
EvidencePending (0%)📖 0 cit🗣 1 debates 7 support 2 oppose
✓ All Quality Gates Passed
Mechanistic 0.63 (15%) Evidence 0.52 (15%) Novelty 0.64 (12%) Feasibility 0.60 (12%) Impact 0.43 (12%) Druggability 0.24 (10%) Safety 0.47 (8%) Competition 0.66 (6%) Data Avail. 0.58 (5%) Reproducible 0.50 (5%) KG Connect 0.50 (8%) 0.530 composite
☰ Compare⚔️ Duel⚛️ Collide
📄 Export LaTeX
arXiv PreprintNeurIPSNature MethodsPLOS ONE
📖 Export BibTeXinteract with this hypothesis
Composite53%

🧪 Overview

This hypothesis is biologically plausible and potentially important for circuit-level phenotypes, but current support is stronger for contextual selectivity than for distinct intrinsic C1q biochemical programs at inhibitory versus excitatory terminals. It is more valuable for endpoint design and disease-stage interpretation than as a near-term therapeutic thesis.

🧬 Mechanism

🧬 Curated Mechanism Pathway

Curated pathway from expert analysis

flowchart TD
    A["Stressed Synapse<br/>C1q Ligand Exposed"]
    B["C1q Deposition<br/>Synaptic Tagging"]
    C["C3 Cleavage<br/>C3b Opsonization"]
    D["CR3 Recognition<br/>Microglial Receptor"]
    E["Synaptic Pruning<br/>Phagocytic Engulfment"]
    F["Synapse Loss<br/>Circuit Disruption"]
    G["Cognitive Decline<br/>Memory Impairment"]
    A --> B
    B --> C
    C --> D
    D --> E
    E --> F
    F --> G
    style A fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#ef9a9a,color:#ef9a9a
    style G fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#ef9a9a,color:#ef9a9a

⚖️ Evidence

⚖️ Evidence Matrix7 supports2 contradicts
Supports
AD mouse models show cell-type and synapse-class selective engulfment, consistent with possible circuit-biased C1q vulnerability.
PMID:37118504
Supports
Complement-mediated synapse loss is established, leaving room for differential class susceptibility across circuits.
PMID:27033548
Supports
Perivascular cells induce microglial phagocytic states and synaptic engulfment via SPP1 in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease.
Nat Neurosci2023PMID:36747024
Supports
An integrative analysis of single-cell and bulk transcriptome and bidirectional mendelian randomization analysis identified C1Q as a novel stimulated risk gene for Atherosclerosis.
Front Immunol2023PMID:38179058
Supports
Progranulin Deficiency Promotes Circuit-Specific Synaptic Pruning by Microglia via Complement Activation.
Cell2016PMID:27114033
Supports
Identification of crosstalk genes and immune characteristics between Alzheimer's disease and atherosclerosis.
Front Immunol2024PMID:39188714
Supports
Deciphering the preeclampsia-specific immune microenvironment and the role of pro-inflammatory macrophages at the maternal-fetal interface.
Elife2025PMID:40152904
Contradicts
Observed selectivity may arise from network activity, anatomy, or glial preference rather than synapse-intrinsic C1q coding.
PMID:37118504
Contradicts
Evidence does not yet show fundamentally distinct C1q biochemical programs at inhibitory versus excitatory synapses.
PMID:37118504
📖 Linked Papers

No linked papers recorded for this hypothesis yet.

🏥 Translation

🧬 3D Protein Structure — C1QA

🧬 PDB 1PK6 Click to expand

Experimental structure from RCSB PDB | Powered by Mol*

🧠 GTEx v10 Brain ExpressionJSON

Median TPM across 13 brain regions for C1QA,C1QB,C1QC,GAD1,GAD2,SLC6A1,SLC17A7,ITGAM,ITGB2 from GTEx v10.

Spinal cord cervical c-174.7 Substantia nigra38.2median TPM (GTEx v10)

💉 Clinical Trials

No clinical trials data linked to this hypothesis yet.

No curated ClinVar variants loaded for this hypothesis.

Run scripts/backfill_clinvar_variants.py to fetch P/LP/VUS variants.

🔍 Search ClinVar for C1QA,C1QB,C1QC,GAD1,GAD2,SLC6A1,SLC17A7,ITGAM,ITGB2 →

No DepMap CRISPR Chronos data found for C1QA,C1QB,C1QC,GAD1,GAD2,SLC6A1,SLC17A7,ITGAM,ITGB2.

Run python3 scripts/backfill_hypothesis_depmap.py to populate.

💰 Estimated Development
Cost
$0
Timeline

🏆 Tournament

🏆 Arenas / Elo

No arena matches recorded yet. Browse Arenas →

📊 Market Indicators

7d Trend
Stable
7d Momentum
▲ 0.0%
Volatility
Low
0.0087
Events (7d)
0
Price History
▼0.3%

💾 Resource Usage

LLM Tokens
19,754
$0.0593
Total Cost
$0.0593

🔮 Predictions

🔎 Predictions vs Observations2 predictions · 0 with recorded observations
PredictionPredictedObservedStatusConf
IF C1q is globally knocked out in mice from birth, THEN excitatory dendritic spine density will increase by >30% relative to wild‑type while inhibitory synapse puncta (GAD1+) remain unchanged at 8 weeExcitatory spine density will be >30% higher in C1q KO vs WT; GAD1+ puncta will show <5% change.— no observation —pending0.55
IF C1q is acutely overexpressed in adult mouse visual cortex via AAV for 4 weeks, THEN excitatory synapse density will decrease by >20% while inhibitory synapse density remains unchanged.Excitatory synaptic markers (VGLUT1) will be reduced >20% and inhibitory markers (GAD1) will show <5% change.— no observation —pending0.60
🔮 Falsifiable Predictions (2)
pendingconf 60%
IF C1q is acutely overexpressed in adult mouse visual cortex via AAV for 4 weeks, THEN excitatory synapse density will decrease by >20% while inhibitory synapse density remains unchanged.
Predicted outcome: Excitatory synaptic markers (VGLUT1) will be reduced >20% and inhibitory markers (GAD1) will show <5% change.
Falsification: Excitatory synapse density reduction <5% or inhibitory synapse density also reduced by >10%, indicating no synapse-class specificity.
pendingconf 55%
IF C1q is globally knocked out in mice from birth, THEN excitatory dendritic spine density will increase by >30% relative to wild‑type while inhibitory synapse puncta (GAD1+) remain unchanged at 8 weeks of age.
Predicted outcome: Excitatory spine density will be >30% higher in C1q KO vs WT; GAD1+ puncta will show <5% change.
Falsification: Excitatory spine density increase <10% or inhibitory synapse density also increases by >10%, disproving class‑specific susceptibility.
View on SciDEX ↗