🧪
hypothesis

c-Abl Tyrosine Kinase Activation Drives α-Synuclein Phosphorylation and Neurodegeneration in PD

Hypothesis

c-Abl Tyrosine Kinase Activation Drives α-Synuclein Phosphorylation and Neurodegeneration in PD

c-Abl (ABL1) phosphorylates α-synuclein at Y39, promoting aggregation and neuronal toxicity.
🧬 ABL1🩺 neurodegeneration🎯 Composite 60%💱 $0.55▼9.0%proposed
EvidencePending (0%)📖 0 cit🗣 1 debates 4 support 4 oppose
✓ All Quality Gates Passed
Mechanistic 0.58 (15%) Evidence 0.68 (15%) Novelty 0.60 (12%) Feasibility 0.55 (12%) Impact 0.52 (12%) Druggability 0.70 (10%) Safety 0.50 (8%) Competition 0.60 (6%) Data Avail. 0.72 (5%) Reproducible 0.60 (5%) KG Connect 0.19 (8%) 0.605 composite
☰ Compare⚔️ Duel⚛️ Collide
📄 Export LaTeX
arXiv PreprintNeurIPSNature MethodsPLOS ONE
📖 Export BibTeXinteract with this hypothesis
Composite60%

🧪 Overview

c-Abl (ABL1) phosphorylates α-synuclein at Y39, promoting aggregation and neuronal toxicity. Nilotinib (FDA-approved for CML) inhibits c-Abl and promotes α-syn clearance via autophagy, representing a rapid translational candidate. However, the hypothesis faces significant challenges: (1) Y39 phosphorylation is less abundant than S129 in human synucleinopathies and its aggregation role is contested; (2) Nilotinib failed its primary endpoint in PD clinical trials (Ko et al. 2020) with no UPDRS improvement; (3) BBB penetration claims are disputed; (4) Nilotinib has multiple off-target effects (DDR1, DDR2) that may explain any apparent neuroprotection independent of c-Abl. The Mechanism Attribution Problem is severe—any observed benefit cannot be confidently assigned to c-Abl inhibition.

🧬 Mechanism

🧬 Curated Mechanism Pathway

Curated pathway from expert analysis

flowchart TD
    A["ABL1/c-Abl<br/>Tyrosine Kinase Activation"]
    B["Mitochondrial<br/>Dysfunction"]
    C["Oxidative<br/>Stress"]
    D["p53 Activation<br/>Pro-apoptotic Signaling"]
    E["Synaptic<br/>Dysfunction"]
    F["Neuronal<br/>Death"]
    G["Dasatinib / Nilotinib<br/>Kinase Inhibition"]
    A --> B
    B --> C
    C --> D
    D --> F
    A --> E
    E --> F
    G --> A
    style A fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#ef9a9a,color:#ef9a9a
    style F fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#ef9a9a,color:#ef9a9a
    style G fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#a5d6a7,color:#a5d6a7

⚖️ Evidence

⚖️ Evidence Matrix4 supports4 contradicts
Supports
c-Abl phosphorylates α-syn at Y39 promoting aggregation; PMID 35831381
PMID:35831381
Supports
Nilotinib crosses BBB and reduces α-syn in preclinical models
Supports
c-Abl activity elevated in PD substantia nigra; PMID related
Supports
Nilotinib FDA-approved for CML—established safety and manufacturing
Contradicts
Ko et al. 2020 trial failed primary endpoint (UPDRS)—no clinical efficacy despite CSF α-syn reduction
Contradicts
Y39 phosphorylation is minor modification vs S129; role in aggregation contested
Contradicts
Nilotinib has multiple off-target kinases (DDR1, DDR2); benefit cannot be attributed to c-Abl
Contradicts
BBB penetration claims disputed—therapeutic concentrations in SN uncertain
📖 Linked Papers

No linked papers recorded for this hypothesis yet.

🏥 Translation

🧬 3D Protein Structure — ABL1

No curated PDB or AlphaFold mapping for ABL1 yet. Search RCSB →

🧠 GTEx v10 Brain ExpressionJSON

Median TPM across 13 brain regions for ABL1 from GTEx v10.

Spinal cord cervical c-140.0 Cerebellum24.4 Substantia nigra20.4 Cerebellar Hemisphere19.6 Hypothalamus19.5 Cortex18.8 Hippocampus17.5 Caudate basal ganglia17.2 Nucleus accumbens basal ganglia16.8 Frontal Cortex BA915.9 Putamen basal ganglia15.8 Amygdala15.4 Anterior cingulate cortex BA2414.7median TPM (GTEx v10)

💉 Clinical Trials

No clinical trials data linked to this hypothesis yet.

No curated ClinVar variants loaded for this hypothesis.

Run scripts/backfill_clinvar_variants.py to fetch P/LP/VUS variants.

🔍 Search ClinVar for ABL1 →

No DepMap CRISPR Chronos data found for ABL1.

Run python3 scripts/backfill_hypothesis_depmap.py to populate.

🏆 Tournament

🏆 Arenas / Elo

No arena matches recorded yet. Browse Arenas →

📊 Market Indicators

7d Trend
Stable
7d Momentum
▼ 0.6%
Volatility
Low
0.0024
Events (7d)
3
Price History
▼9.0%

💾 Resource Usage

No resource usage or linked notebooks recorded for this hypothesis yet.

🔮 Predictions

🔎 Predictions vs Observations2 predictions · 0 with recorded observations
PredictionPredictedObservedStatusConf
IF patients with idiopathic PD receive 6 months of nilotinib (300mg daily, the dose used in the Ko et al. 2020 trial) plus standard dopaminergic therapy versus placebo plus standard therapy, THEN striNo significant difference in F-DOPA Ki values between nilotinib and placebo groups after 6 months; projected effect size <0.15 standardized units.— no observation —pending0.35
IF ABL1 knockout or ABL1 Y245F kinase-dead knock-in neurons are challenged with preformed α-synuclein fibrils, THEN Y39-phosphorylated α-synuclein will be reduced by >70% and aggregate burden will decY39-pS129 double-positive inclusions will be reduced by >70% in ABL1-deficient neurons; autophagy flux markers (LC3-II/LC3-I ratio) will not differ from baselin— no observation —pending0.55
🔮 Falsifiable Predictions (2)
pendingconf 55%
IF ABL1 knockout or ABL1 Y245F kinase-dead knock-in neurons are challenged with preformed α-synuclein fibrils, THEN Y39-phosphorylated α-synuclein will be reduced by >70% and aggregate burden will decrease compared to wild-type neurons, confirming ABL1 drives Y39 phosphorylation independent of off-t
Predicted outcome: Y39-pS129 double-positive inclusions will be reduced by >70% in ABL1-deficient neurons; autophagy flux markers (LC3-II/LC3-I ratio) will not differ fr
Falsification: If Y39 phosphorylation and aggregate burden do not differ between ABL1 knockout and wild-type neurons (difference <20%), Y39 phosphorylation is driven by kinases other than ABL1 and the hypothesis is
pendingconf 35%
IF patients with idiopathic PD receive 6 months of nilotinib (300mg daily, the dose used in the Ko et al. 2020 trial) plus standard dopaminergic therapy versus placebo plus standard therapy, THEN striatal dopamine turnover (measured by F-DOPA PET) will show no significant difference between groups,
Predicted outcome: No significant difference in F-DOPA Ki values between nilotinib and placebo groups after 6 months; projected effect size <0.15 standardized units.
Falsification: If nilotinib-treated patients show ≥15% improvement in F-DOPA Ki at 6 months compared to placebo (p<0.05), the hypothesis that nilotinib's neuroprotective effects are attributable to c-Abl inhibition
View on SciDEX ↗