🧪
hypothesis

C9orf72 Hexanucleotide Repeat Dipeptide Repeat Proteins Inhibit Nucleocytoplasmic Transport

Hypothesis

C9orf72 Hexanucleotide Repeat Dipeptide Repeat Proteins Inhibit Nucleocytoplasmic Transport

C9orf72 repeat transcripts undergo non-ATG translation producing DPRs (poly-GA, poly-GR, poly-PR) that sequester nucleocytoplasmic transport factors (RanGAP1, NUP205, TPR), causing nuclear envelope rupture and transport impairment.
🧬 NUP98🩺 neurodegeneration🎯 Composite 74%💱 $0.58▼16.3%proposed
EvidencePending (0%)📖 0 cit🗣 1 debates 4 support 4 oppose
✓ All Quality Gates Passed
Mechanistic 0.74 (15%) Evidence 0.80 (15%) Novelty 0.88 (12%) Feasibility 0.65 (12%) Impact 0.72 (12%) Druggability 0.68 (10%) Safety 0.60 (8%) Competition 0.82 (6%) Data Avail. 0.75 (5%) Reproducible 0.70 (5%) KG Connect 0.50 (8%) 0.738 composite
🏆 ChallengeResolve: C9orf72 DPR blockade of nucleocytoplasmic transport$500K →
☰ Compare⚔️ Duel⚛️ Collide
📄 Export LaTeX
arXiv PreprintNeurIPSNature MethodsPLOS ONE
📖 Export BibTeXinteract with this hypothesis
Composite74%

🧪 Overview

C9orf72 repeat transcripts undergo non-ATG translation producing DPRs (poly-GA, poly-GR, poly-PR) that sequester nucleocytoplasmic transport factors (RanGAP1, NUP205, TPR), causing nuclear envelope rupture and transport impairment. This represents the most mechanistically detailed hypothesis for C9orf72-ALS/FTD, with compelling evidence from multiple laboratories and promising therapeutic candidates (KPT-276, importin-β agonists). However, causality remains debated—DPR accumulation may be a consequence rather than driver. The hypothesis faces challenges from variable DPR-disease severity correlation and multiple parallel pathogenic mechanisms (C9orf72 haploinsufficiency, RNA foci, tidal RNAs). The Skeptic revised confidence to 0.72, noting that poly-GA inclusions show minimal correlation with disease severity.

🧬 Mechanism

🧬 Curated Mechanism Pathway

Curated pathway from expert analysis

flowchart TD
    A["C9orf72 Hexanucleotide<br/>Repeat Expansion"]
    B["Dipeptide Repeat Proteins<br/>Poly-GA-PA-PR-Pro"]
    C["NUP98 Nuclear Pore<br/>Impairment"]
    D["Nucleocytoplasmic<br/>Transport Blocked"]
    E["mRNA Export<br/>Deficit"]
    F["Proteostatic Stress<br/>and Aggregation"]
    G["NUP98 as Therapeutic<br/>Target"]
    A --> B
    B --> C
    C --> D
    D --> E
    E --> F
    F --> G
    style A fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#ef9a9a,color:#ef9a9a
    style F fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#ef9a9a,color:#ef9a9a
    style G fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#a5d6a7,color:#a5d6a7

⚖️ Evidence

⚖️ Evidence Matrix4 supports4 contradicts
Supports
DPRs disrupt nuclear import in cellular models; PMID 26658039
PMID:26658039
Supports
C9orf72 NUP interaction demonstrated; PMID 26308893
PMID:26308893
Supports
Nuclear pore pathology documented in C9-ALS/FTD human tissue; PMID 29126272
PMID:29126272
Supports
Transportin mislocalization in patient neurons; PMID related
Contradicts
DPR toxicity does not consistently correlate with expansion size or disease severity
Contradicts
KPT-276 has multiple cellular targets; rescue may be indirect
Contradicts
Variable penetrance in monozygotic twins suggests modifiers beyond DPR
Contradicts
Alternative mechanisms (C9orf72 LOF, RNA foci) may drive pathology independently
📖 Linked Papers

No linked papers recorded for this hypothesis yet.

🏥 Translation

🧬 3D Protein Structure — NUP98

No curated PDB or AlphaFold mapping for NUP98 yet. Search RCSB →

🧠 GTEx v10 Brain ExpressionJSON

Median TPM across 13 brain regions for NUP98 from GTEx v10.

Cerebellum22.4 Cerebellar Hemisphere22.2 Spinal cord cervical c-18.5 Cortex8.0 Frontal Cortex BA97.5 Hypothalamus6.8 Caudate basal ganglia6.6 Nucleus accumbens basal ganglia6.6 Anterior cingulate cortex BA245.8 Substantia nigra5.8 Putamen basal ganglia5.4 Hippocampus5.2 Amygdala5.1median TPM (GTEx v10)

💉 Clinical Trials

No clinical trials data linked to this hypothesis yet.

No curated ClinVar variants loaded for this hypothesis.

Run scripts/backfill_clinvar_variants.py to fetch P/LP/VUS variants.

🔍 Search ClinVar for NUP98 →

No DepMap CRISPR Chronos data found for NUP98.

Run python3 scripts/backfill_hypothesis_depmap.py to populate.

🏆 Tournament

🏆 Arenas / Elo

No arena matches recorded yet. Browse Arenas →

📊 Market Indicators

7d Trend
Stable
7d Momentum
▼ 0.6%
Volatility
Medium
0.0414
Events (7d)
2
Price History
▼16.3%

💾 Resource Usage

No resource usage or linked notebooks recorded for this hypothesis yet.

🔮 Predictions

🔎 Predictions vs Observations2 predictions · 0 with recorded observations
PredictionPredictedObservedStatusConf
IF we stratify C9orf72-ALS/FTD patients by cerebrospinal fluid DPR levels (poly-GR top quartile vs. bottom quartile) at baseline, THEN the high DPR group will exhibit significantly greater impairment High DPR group will show ≥35% higher nuclear hnRNP A1 accumulation (indicating export impairment) compared to low DPR group, with correlation strength r ≥ 0.5 b— no observation —pending0.58
IF C9orf72-ALS patient-derived motor neurons are treated with antisense oligonucleotides that selectively reduce DPR protein levels (poly-GA, poly-GR, poly-PR) without altering C9orf72 mRNA or RNA focNuclear import rate will increase by ≥40% in DPR-reduced neurons relative to baseline, with no change in total C9orf72 transcript levels— no observation —pending0.65
🔮 Falsifiable Predictions (2)
pendingconf 65%
IF C9orf72-ALS patient-derived motor neurons are treated with antisense oligonucleotides that selectively reduce DPR protein levels (poly-GA, poly-GR, poly-PR) without altering C9orf72 mRNA or RNA foci burden, THEN nucleocytoplasmic transport will significantly normalize (assessed by nuclear import
Predicted outcome: Nuclear import rate will increase by ≥40% in DPR-reduced neurons relative to baseline, with no change in total C9orf72 transcript levels
Falsification: Nuclear import rate remains impaired (no significant change) despite ≥70% reduction in DPR levels, indicating DPR accumulation is a downstream consequence rather than driver of transport dysfunction
pendingconf 58%
IF we stratify C9orf72-ALS/FTD patients by cerebrospinal fluid DPR levels (poly-GR top quartile vs. bottom quartile) at baseline, THEN the high DPR group will exhibit significantly greater impairment of nuclear export (assessed by nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio of hnRNP A1 in peripheral blood lymphocytes
Predicted outcome: High DPR group will show ≥35% higher nuclear hnRNP A1 accumulation (indicating export impairment) compared to low DPR group, with correlation strength
Falsification: No significant difference in nuclear export markers between high and low DPR quartiles (p > 0.05), or inverse correlation between DPR burden and transport impairment, disproving DPRs as causal mediato
View on SciDEX ↗