🧪
hypothesis

Dominant-Negative Spliceosome Titration

Hypothesis

Dominant-Negative Spliceosome Titration

Intron-retained GBA transcripts sequester core spliceosomal components (U2AF65, SF3B1, PRPF8) and snRNPs, reducing the available pool for wild-type GBA pre-mRNA processing.
🧬 U2AF2, SF3B1, PRPF8; splicing snRNPs🎯 Composite 64%💱 $0.58▼9.5%proposed
neurodegeneration
EvidencePending (0%)📖 0 cit🗣 1 debates 3 support 3 oppose
✓ All Quality Gates Passed
Mechanistic 0.65 (15%) Evidence 0.43 (15%) Novelty 0.00 (12%) Feasibility 0.00 (12%) Impact 0.00 (12%) Druggability 0.00 (10%) Safety 0.00 (8%) Competition 0.00 (6%) Data Avail. 0.00 (5%) Reproducible 0.70 (5%) KG Connect 0.50 (8%) 0.645 composite
☰ Compare⚔️ Duel⚛️ Collide
📄 Export LaTeX
arXiv PreprintNeurIPSNature MethodsPLOS ONE
📖 Export BibTeXinteract with this hypothesis
Composite64%

🧪 Overview

Intron-retained GBA transcripts sequester core spliceosomal components (U2AF65, SF3B1, PRPF8) and snRNPs, reducing the available pool for wild-type GBA pre-mRNA processing. This cis-trans interference causes inefficient removal of downstream introns, producing additional aberrant transcripts with PTCs that are degraded by NMD, establishing a positive feedback loop that progressively depletes mature GBA mRNA and protein. The mechanism explains why a minority aberrant isoform disproportionately affects protein output beyond simple haploinsufficiency.

🧬 Mechanism

🧬 Curated Mechanism Pathway

Curated pathway from expert analysis

flowchart TD
    A["U2AF2 / SF3B1 / PRPF8<br/>Spliceosome Components"]
    B["Dominant-Negative<br/>Spliceosome Titration"]
    C["Alternative Splicing<br/>Dysregulation"]
    D["Non-Productive<br/>mRNA Splicing"]
    E["Protein<br/>Dosage Imbalance"]
    F["Neurodegeneration<br/>ALS / FTD"]
    G["Stress Granule<br/>Formation"]
    A --> B
    B --> C
    B --> D
    C --> E
    D --> E
    E --> F
    F --> G
    style A fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#ce93d8,color:#ce93d8
    style F fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#ef9a9a,color:#ef9a9a
    style G fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#ef9a9a,color:#ef9a9a

⚖️ Evidence

⚖️ Evidence Matrix3 supports3 contradicts
Supports
Spliceosome component sequestration by aberrant transcripts demonstrated in spinal muscular atrophy
PMID:30808715
Supports
Intron retention disrupts global splicing networks in neurodegeneration
PMID:26795847
Supports
Splicing modulators (plesiastatins, etc.) provide druggable entry points
PMID:32619483
Contradicts
Spliceosome components exist in substantial excess relative to processing demands
PMID:31171707
Contradicts
snRNP recycling occurs rapidly (seconds) making stable sequestration unlikely
PMID:30617178
Contradicts
Global splicing disruption inconsistent with observations in cells with intron-retained transcripts
PMID:26795847
📖 Linked Papers

No linked papers recorded for this hypothesis yet.

🏥 Translation

🧬 3D Protein Structure — U2AF2

No curated PDB or AlphaFold mapping for U2AF2 yet. Search RCSB →

🧠 GTEx v10 Brain ExpressionJSON

Median TPM across 13 brain regions for U2AF2, SF3B1, PRPF8; splicing snRNPs from GTEx v10.

Cerebellum145 Cerebellar Hemisphere141 Spinal cord cervical c-159.2 Cortex59.1 Frontal Cortex BA957.2 Nucleus accumbens basal ganglia50.7 Hypothalamus49.4 Caudate basal ganglia48.6 Anterior cingulate cortex BA2443.3 Substantia nigra41.0 Putamen basal ganglia39.5 Amygdala38.5 Hippocampus38.4median TPM (GTEx v10)

💉 Clinical Trials

No clinical trials data linked to this hypothesis yet.

No curated ClinVar variants loaded for this hypothesis.

Run scripts/backfill_clinvar_variants.py to fetch P/LP/VUS variants.

🔍 Search ClinVar for U2AF2, SF3B1, PRPF8; splicing snRNPs →

No DepMap CRISPR Chronos data found for U2AF2, SF3B1, PRPF8; splicing snRNPs.

Run python3 scripts/backfill_hypothesis_depmap.py to populate.

🏆 Tournament

🏆 Arenas / Elo

No arena matches recorded yet. Browse Arenas →

📊 Market Indicators

7d Trend
Stable
7d Momentum
▼ 0.7%
Volatility
Low
0.0064
Events (7d)
2
Price History
▼9.5%

💾 Resource Usage

No resource usage or linked notebooks recorded for this hypothesis yet.

🔮 Predictions

🔎 Predictions vs Observations2 predictions · 0 with recorded observations
PredictionPredictedObservedStatusConf
If spliceosome dysfunction is a causal driver of neurodegeneration, then restoring splicing fidelity (e.g., with PRPF8, SF3B1 overexpression, or spliceosome assembly factors) will rescue synaptic funciPSC-derived neurons from neurodegeneration patients with spliceosome component deficiency (U2AF2, SF3B1 mutations) show restored splicing patterns (RNA-seq con— no observation —pending0.70
If dominant-negative spliceosome titration (U2AF2/SF3B1/PRPF8 dysfunction) drives neurodegeneration through splicing dysregulation, then neurons exposed to spliceosome inhibitors will accumulate mis-sPrimary cortical neurons treated with spliceosome inhibitor (pladienolide B, 1-10 nM, 48h) show: >50% of genes with altered splicing (RNA-seq, >30% with extende— no observation —pending0.74
🔮 Falsifiable Predictions (2)
pendingconf —
If dominant-negative spliceosome titration (U2AF2/SF3B1/PRPF8 dysfunction) drives neurodegeneration through splicing dysregulation, then neurons exposed to spliceosome inhibitors will accumulate mis-spliced transcripts with 3'UTR extensions, increased RISC-loading, and reduced protein output for ess
Predicted outcome: Primary cortical neurons treated with spliceosome inhibitor (pladienolide B, 1-10 nM, 48h) show: >50% of genes with altered splicing (RNA-seq, >30% wi
Falsification: Spliceosome inhibition does not produce 3'UTR extension pattern or synaptic protein loss; neurons maintain normal splicing fidelity and protein synthesis under spliceosome stress, indicating spliceoso
pendingconf —
If spliceosome dysfunction is a causal driver of neurodegeneration, then restoring splicing fidelity (e.g., with PRPF8, SF3B1 overexpression, or spliceosome assembly factors) will rescue synaptic function and reduce neurodegeneration markers in patient-derived neurons.
Predicted outcome: iPSC-derived neurons from neurodegeneration patients with spliceosome component deficiency (U2AF2, SF3B1 mutations) show restored splicing patterns (R
Falsification: Spliceosome factor restoration does not rescue splicing defects, synaptic protein expression, or neurodegeneration phenotype; disease phenotype persists despite corrected factor levels, indicating spl
View on SciDEX ↗