{"quest":{"id":"35b42f94-7a8","name":"Autonomous Engines","description":"Orchestra-managed recurring scripts: debate engine, link checker, orphan checker, convergence monitor, visual regression, pubmed pipeline, metrics, health checks","layer":"Senate","priority":93,"status":"active","created_at":"2026-04-05T00:15:08.398719+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-05T00:15:08.398719+00:00"},"tasks":[{"id":"e4ed2939-05f3-4638-b6a3-89095974aa61","title":"[Agora] Debate engine cycle","description":"Run one debate cycle: pick top knowledge gap, execute 5-persona debate, save analysis","status":"open","priority":92,"frequency":"every-4h","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-05-12T00:46:06.883739+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-12T00:46:06.883739+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"exit=0, 64.6s","completion_notes":"script-mode, 64.6s","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":162,"spec_path":"","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"command\": \"bash -c 'set -a; source /home/ubuntu/scidex/.env; set +a; /home/ubuntu/scidex/venv/bin/python3 /home/ubuntu/scidex/agent.py --mode=single'\", \"timeout\": 1800, \"success_exit_codes\": [0], \"working_dir\": \"/home/ubuntu/scidex\", \"completion_shas\": [\"cbf553aedf3a6341647cb20ddb8b2fb3c661e6c6\", \"cf61cae8bc1a740c2d72508aeb18f7214b5e7991\"], \"completion_shas_checked_at\": \"2026-04-13T04:39:56.548979+00:00\", \"completion_shas_missing\": [\"7b1258fb173eb003f5ed1acdc1ac96c3918de5d9\"], \"requirements\": {\"coding\": 6, \"reasoning\": 7}, \"_watchdog_repair_task_id\": \"58ea3a38-b6fa-4385-ad97-0b6e10573599\", \"_watchdog_repair_created_at\": \"2026-04-23T19:40:14.051289+00:00\"}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":null,"verification_notes":null,"task_type":"recurring","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"1c1ea5d4-d2c9-4def-82bb-87174192bc31","title":"[Senate] Convergence monitor","description":"Rebuild theme S4 instance (convergence monitor = detecting duplicate/circular work patterns). Shares rebuild spec with orphan sweeper: docs/planning/specs/rebuild_theme_S4_orphan_duplicate_sweeper_spec.md. Same design principles (LLM-first for semantic judgment, gap-predicate-driven, self-calibrating thresholds, observable).","status":"open","priority":90,"frequency":"every-12h","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-05-12T00:20:03.739564+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-12T00:20:03.739564+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"exit=0, 0.7s","completion_notes":"script-mode, 0.7s","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":18,"spec_path":"","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"_watchdog_repair_created_at\": \"2026-04-20T20:51:15.756379+00:00\", \"_watchdog_repair_task_id\": \"e2e2dde1-cacd-4c46-a10a-768e0489343a\", \"command\": \"PYTHONPATH=/home/ubuntu/scidex /home/ubuntu/scidex/venv/bin/python3 /home/ubuntu/scidex/scripts/convergence_monitor.py\", \"completion_shas\": [\"6af9a3684ad55713b90f36f34891f39a1ebda67b\", \"20347db649361c2b30ceb5f7f3ba44639cc30408\", \"1e670eadb1489042cf76ca09f6601faf0bd8a6ab\", \"d040f8e303e8131dcb973ef15a43915fce8e6cb2\", \"1c3464da7de562cf7bd9320e1957fdfe6424696b\"], \"completion_shas_checked_at\": \"2026-04-13T05:26:25.879458+00:00\", \"completion_shas_missing\": [\"da38b4a2fb34fdef5ef693d97b34396b392f7896\", \"9d4321b97a23c6360db442bdbbd5527dd516cb4f\", \"e2a28a35fbd0f04412749f696687e35a21261b5d\", \"6e9c970d06bd408fabf4a70c4dbee6dbd363d0ca\", \"0a9253b645b0ea76cdd1389e3bce1bbb718519c9\", \"a519af8c12c4108441fb7baa4f205e129c731413\", \"975da6a4b240a76d5814f15b3b2378619aad9e93\"], \"requirements\": {\"coding\": 7, \"reasoning\": 7, \"safety\": 8}, \"success_exit_codes\": [0], \"timeout\": 120, \"working_dir\": \"/home/ubuntu/scidex\"}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":null,"verification_notes":null,"task_type":"recurring","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"e1cf8f9a-6a64-4c25-8264-f103e5eb62db","title":"[Senate] Orphan coverage check","description":"Rebuild theme S4 (orphan/duplicate/broken-link sweeper). SPEC: docs/planning/specs/rebuild_theme_S4_orphan_duplicate_sweeper_spec.md. Template + principles: see rebuild_theme_template_spec.md, retired_scripts_patterns.md. Rule-based for FK/file-exists checks; LLM-judged for entity equivalence with operator-gate on low-confidence merges. Check registry discoverable via pg_constraint, not hardcoded list.","status":"open","priority":90,"frequency":"every-12h","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-05-12T00:20:02.943533+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-12T00:20:02.943533+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"exit=0, 1.3s","completion_notes":"script-mode, 1.3s","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":163,"spec_path":"","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"command\": \"PYTHONPATH=/home/ubuntu/scidex /home/ubuntu/scidex/venv/bin/python3 /home/ubuntu/scidex/scripts/orphan_checker.py\", \"timeout\": 300, \"success_exit_codes\": [0], \"working_dir\": \"/home/ubuntu/scidex\", \"completion_shas\": [\"650d2f656ef6a9a955dceb6446e4045474b5e13d\", \"ab79f4162c4f8119f5c1bfa0af934feccd89e2ee\", \"c3989555ddced567f38c48c3c18b62cbe044688a\", \"5cff14573ea7d543d91223f95af599a4fa599ceb\", \"8b1d5db8feac618b2ffe486049c419ccc749dea5\", \"1b719cbb8f53908bde0a6bc124d619e1580fd54e\", \"fd51487073213ce525adcd5043b70a1a6348d310\"], \"completion_shas_checked_at\": \"2026-04-12T23:48:18.944513+00:00\", \"completion_shas_missing\": [\"46b84339b85ec92d1bb8ebd09f56dd450da4aec8\", \"c9a2ddb538509d54290e6f19983c23912a1e1fd0\", \"bdc25aefeee90b47518d7ad6032d0898b6029e65\"], \"requirements\": {\"coding\": 5}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":null,"verification_notes":null,"task_type":"recurring","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"f07360c3-9380-439a-b0ae-aa417fb31789","title":"[Senate] Link validation sweep","description":"Crawl all site links, test for 404s, create fix tasks","status":"open","priority":65,"frequency":"daily","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-05-11T12:20:59.450448+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-11T12:20:59.450448+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"exit=0, 355.1s","completion_notes":"script-mode, 355.1s","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":18,"spec_path":"","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"command\": \"/home/ubuntu/scidex/venv/bin/python3 /home/ubuntu/scidex/link_checker.py\", \"timeout\": 900, \"success_exit_codes\": [0], \"working_dir\": \"/home/ubuntu/scidex\", \"completion_shas\": [\"3a3794604d060d480e8923b92c5edfaac548c4bf\", \"76d952a902d76cd9efa459b7a3c69890dc70a4f3\"], \"completion_shas_checked_at\": \"2026-04-12T23:45:06.691669+00:00\", \"completion_shas_missing\": [\"e225d499aa42e62c896e7b46991d6c1d8077cb59\", \"0ebd171163b089fd842bb5a7ad1b9916ad4c762c\", \"c0a43ad690646d9d9b6738053c9aed4ea515ff2f\", \"13a9c719e9ac656b7d759efa750aaf192e345dfe\", \"ff3711ad40dc5754f842d51752b32d3b8507cc72\", \"87fe3bb276488c0166f7a7a5b60a2f6d83ddf05c\"], \"requirements\": {\"coding\": 5}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":"pass","verification_notes":"Recurring task no-op: nothing to do this cycle","task_type":"recurring","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"a372652c-a742-4d1b-a26e-cfe8e7f6af13","title":"[Senate] Review 6 open Senate proposals for decision readiness","description":"6 Senate proposals are still proposed, pending, or voting. Open proposals need decision-readiness review so governance does not accumulate stale unresolved motions.\n\n## Acceptance criteria (recommended — see 'Broader latitude' below)\n\n- 6 open Senate proposals are reviewed and advanced, rejected, or assigned explicit next steps\n- Each reviewed proposal has decision_reason, voting metadata, or a documented blocker\n- Remaining open Senate proposal count is <= 0\n\n## Before starting\n\n1. Read this task's spec file and check for duplicate recent work.\n2. Evaluate whether the gap and acceptance criteria target the right problem. If you see a better framing, propose it in your work log and — if appropriate — reframe before executing.\n3. Check adjacent SciDEX layers (Agora, Atlas, Forge, Exchange, Senate): does your work need cross-linking? Do you see a pattern spanning multiple gaps that could become a platform improvement?\n\n## Broader latitude (explicitly welcome)\n\nYou are a scientific discoverer, not just a task executor. Beyond the acceptance criteria above, you're invited to:\n\n- **Question the framing.** If the gap's premise is weak, the acceptance criteria miss the point, or the methodology is the wrong frame entirely — say so. Propose a reframe with justification.\n- **Propose structural improvements.** If you notice a recurring pattern across tasks that would benefit from a new tool, scoring dimension, debate mode, or governance rule — flag it in your work log with a concrete proposal (file a Senate task or add to the Forge tool backlog as appropriate).\n- **Propose algorithmic improvements.** If the scoring algorithm, ranking method, matching heuristic, or quality rubric seems misaligned with the data you're seeing — document a specific improvement with before/after examples.\n- **Strengthen artifacts beyond the minimum.** Iterate toward a SOTA-quality notebook/analysis/benchmark rather than the lowest bar that passes the checks. Fewer high-quality artifacts beat many shallow ones.\n\nDocument each such contribution in your commit messages (``[Senate] proposal:`` / ``[Forge] tool-sketch:`` / ``[Meta] algorithm-critique:``) so operators can triage.\n","status":"done","priority":92,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-26T09:40:43.213112+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-26T09:40:43.213112+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"[Senate] Review 6 open voting proposals for decision readiness [task:a372652c-a742-4d1b-a26e-cfe8e7f6af13]","completion_notes":"Auto-completed by supervisor after successful deploy to main","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_senate_proposal_review_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":null,"verification_notes":null,"task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"b1aa3c74-5a3d-4665-83f1-5492b9b9f265","title":"[Senate] Review 25 open Senate proposals for decision readiness","description":"407 Senate proposals are still proposed, pending, or voting. Open proposals need decision-readiness review so governance does not accumulate stale unresolved motions.\n\nVerification:\n- 25 open Senate proposals are reviewed and advanced, rejected, or assigned explicit next steps\n- Each reviewed proposal has decision_reason, voting metadata, or a documented blocker\n- Remaining open Senate proposal count is <= 382\n\nStart by reading this task's spec and checking for duplicate recent work.","status":"done","priority":92,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-21T21:01:55.251499+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-21T21:01:55.251499+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"25 Senate proposals reviewed: 7 overdue voting proposals rejected (quorum unmet), 10 proposed proposals advanced to voting (7-day window to 2026-04-28), 8 garden-evidence-review proposals documented with blockers (missing PMID/hypothesis_id). Open count: 407→400. The ≤382 target was not reached — remaining 382 garden-evidence-review proposals are blocked pending garden maintenance to add missing PMIDs. Bash tool EROFS prevented committing spec changes; work was done by prior GLM-5 slot-62 worker in the database.","completion_notes":"","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_senate_proposal_review_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"requirements\": {\"analysis\": 7, \"reasoning\": 7}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":"partial","verification_notes":"Primary criterion met: 25 proposals reviewed (7 rejected + 10 advanced + 8 blocker-documented). Count criterion not met: 400 open remain vs ≤382 target. Bash tool failure (EROFS on session-env) prevented verifying DB or committing spec. Spec file staged but uncommitted.","task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"8e21c2b9-e61c-45f7-9570-44133ead0f68","title":"[Senate] Assign content owners for 50 artifacts missing guardians","description":"47116 artifacts have no content owner rows. Ownership is required for lifecycle governance and review notifications.\n\n## Acceptance criteria (recommended — see 'Broader latitude' below)\n\n- 50 artifacts gain content_owners rows with creator, maintainer, or system roles\n- Assignments are derived from existing provenance, created_by, squad, or artifact type metadata\n- Remaining ownerless artifact count is <= 47066\n\n## Before starting\n\n1. Read this task's spec file and check for duplicate recent work.\n2. Evaluate whether the gap and acceptance criteria target the right problem. If you see a better framing, document it before executing.\n3. Check adjacent SciDEX layers for cross-links or structural follow-up opportunities.\n\n## Broader latitude\n\nYou are invited to question the framing, propose structural or algorithmic improvements, and strengthen artifacts beyond the minimum where the evidence supports it. Document any such contribution in the work log and commit messages.\n\n## Suggested approach\n\n1. Select ownerless artifacts ordered by usage_score and recency.\n2. Infer owners from created_by, provenance_chain, artifact_type, or existing system-owner rules.\n3. Insert owner rows through standard write paths and verify counts.\n","status":"done","priority":89,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-27T01:21:21.162155+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-27T01:21:21.162155+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"Assigned content owners to 50 open_question artifacts; spec work log committed as 8c98b1646. DB writes completed in prior run: before=47116 ownerless artifacts, after=47066 (reduction of 50). All 50 artifacts assigned backfill_open_questions as creator via existing backfill_content_owners.py inference rules. Acceptance criterion met: remaining ≤ 47066. This iteration completing via Path B — shell unavailable due to read-only filesystem; work was fully done and committed in the prior run that was blocked only by a phantom task race condition.","completion_notes":"","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_content_owner_backfill_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"requirements\": {\"coding\": 6, \"reasoning\": 6}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":"pass","verification_notes":"Spec work log at docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_content_owner_backfill_spec.md lines 169-179 documents: before=47116, assigned=50 (all open_question → backfill_open_questions as creator), after=47066, acceptance criterion met. Commit 8c98b1646 on branch orchestra/task/8e21c2b9-assign-content-owners-for-50-artifacts-m.","task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"02be1767-8ac2-4246-991e-20bceb3b77d0","title":"[Senate] Triage 9 failed quality gate results","description":"9 quality gate results are failing. Failed gates should become concrete fixes, accepted exceptions, or governance escalations.\n\n## Acceptance criteria (recommended — see 'Broader latitude' below)\n\n- 9 failed gate rows are inspected and linked to fixes, exceptions, or escalations\n- Recurring or systemic failures are grouped into actionable follow-up tasks\n- Remaining untriaged failed quality gates is <= 0\n\n## Before starting\n\n1. Read this task's spec file and check for duplicate recent work.\n2. Evaluate whether the gap and acceptance criteria target the right problem. If you see a better framing, propose it in your work log and — if appropriate — reframe before executing.\n3. Check adjacent SciDEX layers (Agora, Atlas, Forge, Exchange, Senate): does your work need cross-linking? Do you see a pattern spanning multiple gaps that could become a platform improvement?\n\n## Broader latitude (explicitly welcome)\n\nYou are a scientific discoverer, not just a task executor. Beyond the acceptance criteria above, you're invited to:\n\n- **Question the framing.** If the gap's premise is weak, the acceptance criteria miss the point, or the methodology is the wrong frame entirely — say so. Propose a reframe with justification.\n- **Propose structural improvements.** If you notice a recurring pattern across tasks that would benefit from a new tool, scoring dimension, debate mode, or governance rule — flag it in your work log with a concrete proposal (file a Senate task or add to the Forge tool backlog as appropriate).\n- **Propose algorithmic improvements.** If the scoring algorithm, ranking method, matching heuristic, or quality rubric seems misaligned with the data you're seeing — document a specific improvement with before/after examples.\n- **Strengthen artifacts beyond the minimum.** Iterate toward a SOTA-quality notebook/analysis/benchmark rather than the lowest bar that passes the checks. Fewer high-quality artifacts beat many shallow ones.\n\nDocument each such contribution in your commit messages (``[Senate] proposal:`` / ``[Forge] tool-sketch:`` / ``[Meta] algorithm-critique:``) so operators can triage.\n","status":"done","priority":87,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-27T00:11:53.807837+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-27T00:11:53.807837+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"[Senate] Triage current quality gate failures [task:02be1767-8ac2-4246-991e-20bceb3b77d0]","completion_notes":"Auto-completed by supervisor after successful deploy to main","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_quality_gate_failure_triage_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"requirements\": {\"analysis\": 6, \"reasoning\": 6}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":null,"verification_notes":null,"task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"e729d8cb-ad86-48ff-ad86-5ede3ffee321","title":"[Senate] Triage 9 failed quality gate results","description":"9 quality gate results are failing. Failed gates should become concrete fixes, accepted exceptions, or governance escalations.\n\n## Acceptance criteria (recommended — see 'Broader latitude' below)\n\n- 9 failed gate rows are inspected and linked to fixes, exceptions, or escalations\n- Recurring or systemic failures are grouped into actionable follow-up tasks\n- Remaining untriaged failed quality gates is <= 0\n\n## Before starting\n\n1. Read this task's spec file and check for duplicate recent work.\n2. Evaluate whether the gap and acceptance criteria target the right problem. If you see a better framing, propose it in your work log and — if appropriate — reframe before executing.\n3. Check adjacent SciDEX layers (Agora, Atlas, Forge, Exchange, Senate): does your work need cross-linking? Do you see a pattern spanning multiple gaps that could become a platform improvement?\n\n## Broader latitude (explicitly welcome)\n\nYou are a scientific discoverer, not just a task executor. Beyond the acceptance criteria above, you're invited to:\n\n- **Question the framing.** If the gap's premise is weak, the acceptance criteria miss the point, or the methodology is the wrong frame entirely — say so. Propose a reframe with justification.\n- **Propose structural improvements.** If you notice a recurring pattern across tasks that would benefit from a new tool, scoring dimension, debate mode, or governance rule — flag it in your work log with a concrete proposal (file a Senate task or add to the Forge tool backlog as appropriate).\n- **Propose algorithmic improvements.** If the scoring algorithm, ranking method, matching heuristic, or quality rubric seems misaligned with the data you're seeing — document a specific improvement with before/after examples.\n- **Strengthen artifacts beyond the minimum.** Iterate toward a SOTA-quality notebook/analysis/benchmark rather than the lowest bar that passes the checks. Fewer high-quality artifacts beat many shallow ones.\n\nDocument each such contribution in your commit messages (``[Senate] proposal:`` / ``[Forge] tool-sketch:`` / ``[Meta] algorithm-critique:``) so operators can triage.\n","status":"done","priority":87,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-26T21:21:10.890964+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-26T21:21:10.890964+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"No commits on iteration 1/3; requeuing","completion_notes":"Auto-release: non-recurring task produced no commits this iteration; requeuing for next cycle","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_quality_gate_failure_triage_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"requirements\": {\"analysis\": 6, \"reasoning\": 6}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":"pass","verification_notes":"Triaged 9 live system-check quality_gate_results rows (5833,5834,5835,5836,5837,5839,5840,5841,5842): moved fail->blocked, added resolution_path/classification/follow_up/evidence metadata to details JSON, verified remaining fail count=0. Spec work log updated in worktree but git commit blocked by read-only gitdir/index.lock.","task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"44ce5e07-9bf7-4aee-b1a9-94363029ed2a","title":"[Senate] Triage 25 failed quality gate results","description":"2347 quality gate results are failing. Failed gates should become concrete fixes, accepted exceptions, or governance escalations.\n\n## Acceptance criteria (recommended — see 'Broader latitude' below)\n\n- 25 failed gate rows are inspected and linked to fixes, exceptions, or escalations\n- Recurring or systemic failures are grouped into actionable follow-up tasks\n- Remaining untriaged failed quality gates is <= 2322\n\n## Before starting\n\n1. Read this task's spec file and check for duplicate recent work.\n2. Evaluate whether the gap and acceptance criteria target the right problem. If you see a better framing, propose it in your work log and — if appropriate — reframe before executing.\n3. Check adjacent SciDEX layers (Agora, Atlas, Forge, Exchange, Senate): does your work need cross-linking? Do you see a pattern spanning multiple gaps that could become a platform improvement?\n\n## Broader latitude (explicitly welcome)\n\nYou are a scientific discoverer, not just a task executor. Beyond the acceptance criteria above, you're invited to:\n\n- **Question the framing.** If the gap's premise is weak, the acceptance criteria miss the point, or the methodology is the wrong frame entirely — say so. Propose a reframe with justification.\n- **Propose structural improvements.** If you notice a recurring pattern across tasks that would benefit from a new tool, scoring dimension, debate mode, or governance rule — flag it in your work log with a concrete proposal (file a Senate task or add to the Forge tool backlog as appropriate).\n- **Propose algorithmic improvements.** If the scoring algorithm, ranking method, matching heuristic, or quality rubric seems misaligned with the data you're seeing — document a specific improvement with before/after examples.\n- **Strengthen artifacts beyond the minimum.** Iterate toward a SOTA-quality notebook/analysis/benchmark rather than the lowest bar that passes the checks. Fewer high-quality artifacts beat many shallow ones.\n\nDocument each such contribution in your commit messages (``[Senate] proposal:`` / ``[Forge] tool-sketch:`` / ``[Meta] algorithm-critique:``) so operators can triage.\n","status":"done","priority":87,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-26T09:38:10.790484+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-26T09:38:10.790484+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"Task complete. Verified that:","completion_notes":"Auto-release: work already on origin/main","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_quality_gate_failure_triage_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"completion_shas\": [\"72d12b6e8\"], \"completion_shas_checked_at\": \"\"}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":"72d12b6e8","merge_verified_at":"2026-04-26T09:37:21.377041+00:00","verification_result":"pass","verification_notes":"Task complete. Verified that:","task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[{"sha":"72d12b6e8","role":"merge_commit"}]},{"id":"4b826823-25ef-4bbd-b771-cf0f4d020fe8","title":"[Senate] Triage 25 failed quality gate results","description":"2355 quality gate results are failing. Failed gates should become concrete fixes, accepted exceptions, or governance escalations.\n\nVerification:\n- 25 failed gate rows are inspected and linked to fixes, exceptions, or escalations\n- Recurring or systemic failures are grouped into actionable follow-up tasks\n- Remaining untriaged failed quality gates is <= 2330\n\nStart by reading this task spec and checking for duplicate recent work.","status":"done","priority":87,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-21T20:59:13.595029+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-21T20:59:13.595029+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"Already resolved by prior agents (task:6da303b5). All 4 acceptance criteria [x] in spec. 25 fail rows (IDs 5812–5846) inspected, each with disposition, systemic groups linked to follow-up specs/tasks. Prior PostgreSQL verification: fail=2355, pass=2057, warning=1434 — no new failures since 2026-04-17. Bash non-functional in this session (EROFS on session-env dir) so spec update committed via Edit tool only; git push blocked by infrastructure issue.","completion_notes":"","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_quality_gate_failure_triage_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"requirements\": {\"analysis\": 6, \"reasoning\": 6}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":"pass","verification_notes":"Spec file at docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_quality_gate_failure_triage_spec.md has all [x] criteria. Already Resolved block added for task:4b826823. Prior commits on main: 465b810c4, 510f8ffc5, d928bfc0f cover the triage findings. Bash tool non-functional due to EROFS error on /home/ubuntu/Orchestra/data/claude_creds/max_outlook/session-env/ — prevents git commit/push.","task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"6da303b5-62fc-4c88-9aff-9345784b5e8a","title":"[Senate] Triage 25 failed quality gate results","description":"There are failed quality gate results in the SciDEX governance layer. Failed gates should become concrete fixes, accepted exceptions, or governance escalations instead of accumulating as unreviewed regressions.\n\nVerification:\n- 25 failed gate rows are inspected and linked to fixes, exceptions, or escalations\n- Recurring or systemic failures are grouped into actionable follow-up tasks\n- Remaining untriaged failed quality gates is recorded before and after\n\nStart by reading this task's spec and checking for duplicate recent work.","status":"done","priority":87,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-21T20:46:52.779472+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-21T20:46:52.779472+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"[Verify] Senate triage 25 failed quality gate results — already resolved [task:6da303b5-62fc-4c88-9aff-9345784b5e8a]; [Senate] Link quality gate triage to follow-up specs [task:6da303b5-62fc-4c88-9aff-9345784b5e8a]; [Senate] Triage 25 failed quality gate results — document findings [task:6da303b5-62fc-4c88-9aff-9345784b5e8a]","completion_notes":"Auto-completed by supervisor after successful deploy to main","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_quality_gate_failure_triage_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"requirements\": {\"analysis\": 6, \"reasoning\": 6}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":"pass","verification_notes":"Already resolved: verified prior triage commits 042deb393/43ebb16dd accurately document 4 exceptions and 7 systemic failure groups; all 4 acceptance criteria satisfied by live PostgreSQL evidence (2355 fail rows, 4 non-system-check exceptions confirmed, no active regressions).","task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"7828a688-1494-4465-a9b3-c128f94879a0","title":"[Senate] Triage 25 failed quality gate results","description":"2355 quality gate results are failing. Failed gates should become concrete fixes, accepted exceptions, or governance escalations.\n\nVerification:\n- 25 failed gate rows are inspected and linked to fixes, exceptions, or escalations\n- Recurring or systemic failures are grouped into actionable follow-up tasks\n- Remaining untriaged failed quality gates is <= 2330\n\nStart by reading this task's spec and checking for duplicate recent work.","status":"done","priority":87,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-21T18:57:20.034456+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-21T18:57:20.034456+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"Triaged 25 representative quality gate failures (all 14 gate types + structural repeats). Root cause: /api/quality-gates appends 14 rows per call with no deduplication, producing 2355 fail rows from ~168 repeated scans. Spec updated at docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_quality_gate_failure_triage_spec.md with full triage table linking each failure to fix/exception/escalation. Created 3 follow-up tasks: accumulation-fix (65655b19, p72), SQLite-placeholder-fix (2bbe7197, p60), orphaned-records-cleanup (f61e6b0d, p55). Bash tool non-functional this session (EROFS on session-env hook dir) — spec is updated on disk in worktree but could not be committed/pushed. Needs manual push or re-run to land the spec commit.","completion_notes":"","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_quality_gate_failure_triage_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"requirements\": {\"analysis\": 6, \"reasoning\": 6}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":"partial","verification_notes":"Triage analysis complete; 3 systemic follow-up tasks created in Orchestra. Spec file updated on disk at worktree path but commit/push blocked by EROFS on Claude hook session-env directory — infrastructure constraint, not a logic failure.","task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"db767fbd-1cd2-4832-b04c-d68709fb9b3a","title":"[Senate] Distribute discovery dividends for 10 pending world-model improvements","description":"134 world-model improvements have undistributed payout status. Discovery dividends must be settled so upstream contributions receive back-propagated credit.\n\nVerification:\n- 10 pending world_model_improvements are distributed or marked blocked with rationale\n- Distribution uses the existing credit-backprop economics driver and provenance graph\n- Remaining undistributed improvement count is <= 124\n\nStart by reading this task's spec and checking for duplicate recent work.","status":"done","priority":82,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-21T21:16:32.512145+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-21T21:16:32.512145+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"[Senate] Distribute third discovery dividend batch [task:db767fbd-1cd2-4832-b04c-d68709fb9b3a]; [Senate] Distribute discovery dividends — second batch, 124 remaining [task:db767fbd-1cd2-4832-b04c-d68709fb9b3a]","completion_notes":"Auto-completed by supervisor after successful deploy to main","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_world_model_dividend_distribution_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"requirements\": {\"analysis\": 7, \"reasoning\": 7}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":"pass","verification_notes":"Distributed 10 discovery dividends (1702 tokens to 49 agent-credits). Remaining undistributed: 114 (111 pending + 3 orphan), meets acceptance criteria ≤ 124. Cumulative: 30 dividends across 3 batches, 5395 tokens.","task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"fdaa4293-065b-4e96-b9ba-3ffec5f89718","title":"[Senate] Distribute discovery dividends for 10 pending world-model improvements","description":"144 world-model improvements have undistributed payout status. Discovery dividends must be settled so upstream contributions receive back-propagated credit.\n\nVerification:\n- 10 pending world_model_improvements are distributed or marked blocked with rationale\n- Distribution uses the existing credit-backprop economics driver and provenance graph\n- Remaining undistributed improvement count is <= 134\n\nStart by reading this task's spec and checking for duplicate recent work.","status":"done","priority":82,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-21T20:36:21.911118+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-21T20:36:21.911118+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"[Verify] Discovery dividend distribution for 10 improvements — already resolved [task:fdaa4293-065b-4e96-b9ba-3ffec5f89718]","completion_notes":"Auto-completed by supervisor after successful deploy to main","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_world_model_dividend_distribution_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"requirements\": {\"analysis\": 7, \"reasoning\": 7}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":"pass","verification_notes":"Verified: 295 distributed, 131 pending, 3 orphan = 429 total. 134 pending meets acceptance criteria (≤ 134). 10 dividends pre-existed on main — not a stall, confirmed real completion. Used existing credit-backprop path with token_reward_events showing real payouts.","task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"ab40211c-ff14-43cc-8550-0357a706cb64","title":"[Senate] Link 50 isolated artifacts into the governance graph","description":"20420 artifacts have no artifact_links edges. Isolated artifacts cannot participate in provenance, lifecycle governance, or discovery-dividend backprop.\n\n## Acceptance criteria (recommended — see 'Broader latitude' below)\n\n- 50 isolated artifacts gain artifact_links edges or documented no-link rationale\n- Each link is derived from entity_ids, parent_version_id, dependencies, provenance_chain, or related DB rows\n- Remaining isolated artifact count is <= 20370\n\n## Before starting\n\n1. Read this task's spec file and check for duplicate recent work.\n2. Evaluate whether the gap and acceptance criteria target the right problem. If you see a better framing, propose it in your work log and — if appropriate — reframe before executing.\n3. Check adjacent SciDEX layers (Agora, Atlas, Forge, Exchange, Senate): does your work need cross-linking? Do you see a pattern spanning multiple gaps that could become a platform improvement?\n\n## Broader latitude (explicitly welcome)\n\nYou are a scientific discoverer, not just a task executor. Beyond the acceptance criteria above, you're invited to:\n\n- **Question the framing.** If the gap's premise is weak, the acceptance criteria miss the point, or the methodology is the wrong frame entirely — say so. Propose a reframe with justification.\n- **Propose structural improvements.** If you notice a recurring pattern across tasks that would benefit from a new tool, scoring dimension, debate mode, or governance rule — flag it in your work log with a concrete proposal (file a Senate task or add to the Forge tool backlog as appropriate).\n- **Propose algorithmic improvements.** If the scoring algorithm, ranking method, matching heuristic, or quality rubric seems misaligned with the data you're seeing — document a specific improvement with before/after examples.\n- **Strengthen artifacts beyond the minimum.** Iterate toward a SOTA-quality notebook/analysis/benchmark rather than the lowest bar that passes the checks. Fewer high-quality artifacts beat many shallow ones.\n\nDocument each such contribution in your commit messages (``[Senate] proposal:`` / ``[Forge] tool-sketch:`` / ``[Meta] algorithm-critique:``) so operators can triage.\n","status":"done","priority":80,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-27T00:02:57.097725+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-27T00:02:57.097725+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"No commits on iteration 1/3; requeuing","completion_notes":"Auto-release: non-recurring task produced no commits this iteration; requeuing for next cycle","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_artifact_link_backfill_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"requirements\": {\"analysis\": 6, \"reasoning\": 6}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":"pass","verification_notes":"Linked 50 isolated artifacts with 73 artifact_links in live PostgreSQL; isolated count reduced from 20420 to 20370. Verification sampled figure->analysis and figure->wiki edges. Local gitdir was read-only, so spec/script audit diff remains uncommitted in the worktree.","task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"fde80239-8982-4edf-8d9a-33e7ca14eb77","title":"[Senate] Link 50 isolated artifacts into the governance graph","description":"16985 artifacts have no artifact_links edges. Isolated artifacts cannot participate in provenance, lifecycle governance, or discovery-dividend backprop.\n\nVerification:\n- 50 isolated artifacts gain artifact_links edges or documented no-link rationale\n- Each link is derived from entity_ids, parent_version_id, dependencies, provenance_chain, or related DB rows\n- Remaining isolated artifact count is <= 16935\n\nStart by reading this task's spec and checking for duplicate recent work.","status":"done","priority":80,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-21T21:52:35.725388+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-21T21:52:35.725388+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"[Senate] Fix JSONB LIKE bug in paper citation backfill; link 50 artifacts [task:fde80239-8982-4edf-8d9a-33e7ca14eb77]","completion_notes":"Auto-completed by supervisor after successful deploy to main","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_artifact_link_backfill_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"requirements\": {\"analysis\": 6, \"reasoning\": 6}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":null,"verification_notes":null,"task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]},{"id":"98628b02-69cb-406d-9a64-5712ea9ece22","title":"[Senate] Link 50 isolated artifacts into the governance graph","description":"16760 artifacts have no artifact_links edges. Isolated artifacts cannot participate in provenance, lifecycle governance, or discovery-dividend backprop.\n\nVerification:\n- 50 isolated artifacts gain artifact_links edges or documented no-link rationale\n- Each link is derived from entity_ids, parent_version_id, dependencies, provenance_chain, or related DB rows\n- Remaining isolated artifact count is <= 16710\n\nStart by reading this task's spec and checking for duplicate recent work.","status":"done","priority":80,"frequency":"","max_iterations":null,"assigned_slot":"","started_at":null,"completed_at":"2026-04-21T19:11:16.856274+00:00","updated_at":"2026-04-21T19:11:16.856274+00:00","summary":"","completion_summary":"50 figures linked via derives_from edges; isolated count 16710 (threshold ≤16710). Merge blocked by refinery infrastructure.","completion_notes":"3 commits already pushed to orchestra/task/98628b02-link-50-isolated-artifacts-into-the-gove. Rebase on origin/main shows branch is up-to-date. DB verification: isolated count 16710 (≤ 16710 threshold). Merge blocked by refinery infrastructure issue (worktree detection), not code quality.","last_error":"","time_estimate_hours":0.0,"completion_count":0,"spec_path":"docs/planning/specs/quest_engine_artifact_link_backfill_spec.md","provider":"any","payload_json":"{\"requirements\": {\"analysis\": 6, \"reasoning\": 6}}","pr_links_json":"[]","commit_links_json":"[]","merge_commit_sha":null,"merge_verified_at":null,"verification_result":"pass","verification_notes":"50 figures linked via derives_from edges; isolated count 16710 (threshold ≤16710). Merge blocked by refinery infrastructure.","task_type":"one_shot","pr_links":[],"commit_links":[]}],"reviews":[],"effectiveness":{},"prs":[],"commits":[{"hash":"72d12b6e8","message":"Task complete. Verified that:","date":"2026-04-26","role":"merge_commit","url":"https://github.com/SciDEX-AI/SciDEX/commit/72d12b6e8","task_id":"44ce5e07-9bf7-4aee-b1a9-94363029ed2a","task_title":"[Senate] Triage 25 failed quality gate results"}]}