Reference proteins to improve Core 1 and Core 2 Alzheimer's disease CSF and plasma biomarkers.

Karlsson L, Janelidze S, Barthélemy NR, Horie K, Therriault J et al.
Brain 2026
Open on PubMed

Concentration-based fluid biomarkers represent an informative and cost-effective way to detect and monitor Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. However, non-AD-related interindividual variation in biofluids can also affect biomarker concentrations. Here, we investigated whether normalization of CSF and plasma biomarkers to reference proteins, such as amyloid-β40 (Aβ40) and non-phosphorylated mid-region tau (np-tau), improves their robustness and reliability of representing AD pathology load. Using the Swedish BioFINDER-2 cohort [n = 1702, 50.7% male, mean (standard deviation) age 68.4 (12.2) years], we compared the associations between tau/Aβ-PET load and fluid biomarkers alone versus biomarkers in a ratio with a reference protein (Aβ40 or np-tau) in univariate linear regression models. Fluid biomarkers included CSF and plasma measures of p-tau217, p-tau181, p-tau205, np-tau181-190, np-tau195-210, np-tau212-221, Aβ42 and Aβ40; CSF MTBR-tau243, SNAP-25, neurogranin, YKL-40 and sTREM2; and plasma eMTBR-tau243. Biomarkers were measured with mass spectrometry assays and/or immunoassays. In addition, we performed validation and extended analyses, comparing, for example, group-level diagnostic differences and longitudinal biomarker trajectories, in three independent prospective cohorts [BioFINDER-1, Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (ADRC) and Translational Biomarkers in Aging and Dementia (TRIAD)] and in an Italian multiple sclerosis cohort. CSF Aβ40 normalization significantly strengthened the associations of several core CSF AD biomarkers, including CSF MTBR-tau243, p-tau isoforms and synaptic biomarkers, with tau-PET (ΔR2 = 0.064-0.24) and Aβ-PET (ΔR2 = 0.016-0.28). Normalization to CSF np-tau mainly improved concordance with Aβ-PET (ΔR2 = -0.0059 to 0.19). The strongest association with tau-PET was observed for MTBR-tau243/Aβ40 (R2 = 0.78, compared with 0.65 for non-normalized MTBR-tau243), and with Aβ-PET for p-tau217/np-tau (R2 = 0.65, compared with 0.46 for non-normalized p-tau217). Plasma biomarker associations with tau-PET improved when using normalization to plasma Aβ40 or np-tau (ΔR2 = 0.004-0.14), with the strongest effect for eMTBR-tau243/np-tau (R2 = 0.72 versus 0.60). Associations with Aβ-PET were enhanced with np-tau normalization (ΔR2 = 0.018-0.16, strongest for p-tau217/np-tau: R2 = 0.62 versus 0.53). The results were replicated in Knight ADRC and TRIAD. Furthermore, longitudinal analyses showed that Aβ40 normalization typically reduced interindividual rather than intra-individual variability over time. Normalization did not enhance group-level differences in inflammatory CSF biomarkers in AD, nor did it improve biomarker associations in the multiple sclerosis cohort. In conclusion, normalization of CSF and plasma biomarkers to reference proteins, such as Aβ40 or np-tau, enhances their association with brain tau and Aβ pathology, making already high-performing AD fluid biomarkers even more accurate.

5 Figures Extracted
Figure 1
Figure 1 PMC
Reference protein-normalized plasma and CSF biomarkers show stronger associations with tau and Aβ-PET. The proportion of explained variance ( R 2 ) w...
Figure 2
Figure 2 PMC
R 2 change during reference protein normalization for plasma and CSF biomarker associations with tau and Aβ-PET in BF2. Bar plots showing the diff...
Figure 3
Figure 3 PMC
Scatter plots demonstrating the increased correlation with temporal meta-region of interest tau-PET load for normalized CSF and plasma biomarkers. Sc...
Figure 4
Figure 4 PMC
Reference protein-normalized CSF biomarkers show stronger discrimination between tau and Aβ-positive and -negative individuals. ROC AUC scores with a...
Figure 5
Figure 5 PMC
Normalized CSF biomarkers show a similar change over time to biomarkers alone, but with reduced interindividual variance. Linear mixed models with in...