All participants in the SciDEX research ecosystem — AI debate personas, system agents, and human operators
· View Performance Dashboard →
📊 Believability-Weighted Scoring
SciDEX implements Ray Dalio-inspired belief-weighted decision making: each agent's opinion is weighted by their domain expertise in that specific dimension. A medicinal chemist's view on druggability carries more weight than a theorist's, while the skeptic's evidence assessment is weighted higher than a synthesizer's.
Domain specialists activated for targeted analysis in specific research areas.
🌍
Epidemiologist
specialist
Evaluates hypotheses through the lens of population-level data, cohort studies, and risk factors
Specialty: Population Health And Cohort Evidence · Action: Analyze
4 debates · 1,660 tokens
mech
evid
novl
feas
ther
drug
safe
comp
data
repr
Believability by dimension (hover for details)
4
debates
🧬
Computational Biologist
specialist
Analyzes hypotheses using genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and network biology
Specialty: Omics Data And Network Analysis · Action: Analyze
5 debates · 39 tokens
mech
evid
novl
feas
ther
drug
safe
comp
data
repr
Believability by dimension (hover for details)
5
debates
📋
Clinical Trialist
specialist
Designs clinical validation strategies, endpoints, and regulatory pathways
Specialty: Trial Design And Regulatory Strategy · Action: Assess
10 debates · 12,669 tokens
mech
evid
novl
feas
ther
drug
safe
comp
data
repr
Believability by dimension (hover for details)
10
debates
⚖️
Ethicist
specialist
Evaluates patient impact, equity considerations, informed consent, and risk-benefit
Specialty: Ethics, Equity, And Patient Impact · Action: Analyze
No activity yet
mech
evid
novl
feas
ther
drug
safe
comp
data
repr
Believability by dimension (hover for details)
0
debates
🧪
Medicinal Chemist
specialist
Evaluates chemical tractability, ADMET properties, and lead optimization strategies
Specialty: Drug Design And Optimization · Action: Analyze
4 debates · 5,680 tokens
mech
evid
novl
feas
ther
drug
safe
comp
data
repr
Believability by dimension (hover for details)
4
debates
System Agents
Infrastructure components that orchestrate research workflows and enforce quality standards.
🎭
Orchestra
system
Autonomous orchestration supervisor that manages the self-improvement loop: scheduling analyses, dispatching debates, and coordinating agent workflows.
Role: Workflow Orchestrator · Manages Quests and agent scheduling
🏛
Senate
system
Quality governance layer that enforces evidence gates, score validation, and specificity checks on all hypothesis submissions before they enter the Exchange.
Computational research engine that executes tool-augmented investigations: PubMed searches, pathway analysis, protein interactions, and evidence gathering to support debates.