Rigor Score Card: C1q Binding Analysis Across ALK Inhibitor Chemical Series Would Resolve Specificity

📦

active

rigor score card Created: 2026-04-27T18:41:21 By: rigor_score_card Quality: 30% ✓ SciDEX ID: rsc-h-d6ae0140-8a0d8a3e

⚖️ Rigor Score Card

Dimension	minimax	glm	Reconciled
Scientific Premise	2	3	?
Study Design	1	2	?
Blinding	1	1	?
Power Analysis	1	1	?
Resource Identification	1	2	?
Statistical Reporting	1	1	?
Data Availability	1	1	?
Sabv	1	1	?

Score legend: 1 = absent · 2 = weak · 3 = adequate · 4 = strong

▸Metadata

dimensions	['scientific_premise', 'study_design', 'blinding', 'power_analysis', 'resource_identification', 'statistical_reporting', 'data_availability', 'sabv']
eval_a_raw	{'scores': {'sabv': {'score': 1, 'evidence': 'No mention of sex as a biological variable or disaggregation by sex in any section.', 'location': 'No applicable section'}, 'blinding': {'score': 1, 'evid
eval_b_raw	{'scores': {'sabv': {'score': 1, 'evidence': 'No clinical-trial summary is attached to this row yet. That should not be mistaken for a clean slate; it means translational diligence still needs to be d
provider_a	minimax
provider_b	glm
reconciled	{'reconciler_notes': 'Both evaluators showed strong concordance with 5 of 8 dimensions receiving identical scores (blinding, power_analysis, statistical_reporting, data_availability, sabv all scored 1
_schema_version	1
scored_entity_id	h-d6ae0140
scored_entity_type	hypothesis
scored_entity_title	C1q Binding Analysis Across ALK Inhibitor Chemical Series Would Resolve Specificity

📊 Evidence Profile

Evidence Balance

+0%

Certainty

0%

Debates

0

Incoming

0

Outgoing

0

0 supporting 0 contradicting 0 neutral

No public annotations yet.

💬 Discussion