🧫
Hybrid immunity plasma protection against Omicron BA.5
active
experiment
Created: 2026-04-10T03:39:55
By: etl-v1-backfill
Quality:
50%
✓ SciDEX
ID: exp-8b475a0a-4cde-46b8-8835-58de11c1da4c
🧫 Experiment Protocol
ValidationCOVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 infectionSARS-CoV-2 spike proteinTriple knock-in mice expressing human ACE2, TMPRSS2, and FCGRTproposed
Evaluation of the protective efficacy of plasma from individuals with different hybrid immunity backgrounds against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 infection in TKI mice. The study compared plasma from individuals with hybrid Omicron BA.1/2 immunity versus those with hybrid Delta immunity. Despite comparable BA.5-binding and neutralizing antibody titers measured in vitro, only plasma from individuals with hybrid Omicron BA.1/2 immunity was able to decrease lung infection with BA.5 in TKI mice. This experiment further demonstrated the importance of variant-specific hybrid immunity and the limitations of in vitro neutralization assays for predicting in vivo protection.
PRIMARY OUTCOME
Reduction of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 lung infection
EXPECTED OUTCOMES
- 1. Omicron BA.1/2 hybrid plasma demonstrates superior BA.5 neutralization (2-4 fold higher GMT) compared to Delta hybrid plasma despite similar BA.5-binding antibody levels
- 2. Omicron BA.1/2 hybrid plasma reduces BA.5 lung viral loads by 2-3 logs compared to controls, while Delta hybrid plasma provides <1 log reduction
- 3. Enhanced protection correlates with broader cross-neutralization against BA.4/BA.5 subvariants and higher antibody avidity indices (>50% retention at 6M urea)
- 4. Omicron BA.1/2 hybrid plasma shows superior Fc effector functions against BA.5 spike with 2-3 fold higher ADCC and ADCP activity
- 5. Protected mice exhibit significantly reduced lung inflammation scores, lower inflammatory cytokine levels, and maintained body weight throughout infection
- 6. Strong correlation between variant-specific neutralization titers and degree of viral load reduction (r>0.7 for BA.5-specific responses)
- 7. Minimal cross-protection from Delta hybrid immunity against BA.5, demonstrating importance of variant-matched immunity for optimal protection
SUCCESS CRITERIA
- • Differential neutralization: Omicron BA.1/2 hybrid plasma shows >2-fold higher BA.5 neutralization GMT compared to Delta hybrid plasma (p<0.05, Mann-Whitney test)
- • Protection efficacy: Omicron BA.1/2 plasma reduces lung viral loads by >2 logs vs controls and >1.5 logs vs Delta plasma (p<0.01, one-way ANOVA)
- • Viral clearance: >60% of Omicron BA.1/2-treated mice achieve viral loads <1000 copies/g tissue compared to <20% with Delta plasma
- • Clinical protection: Significant preservation of body weight and lower clinical scores in Omicron BA.1/2 group (p<0.05, repeated measures ANOVA)
- • Functional correlation: Significant positive correlation between BA.5-specific neutralization and protection (r>0.5, p<0.05, Spearman correlation)
- • Assay quality: Neutralization assays meet WHO standards with appropriate positive/negative controls and CV <30% for duplicate measurements
- • Reproducibility: Primary protection findings replicated in independent experiment with fresh plasma aliquots and similar effect sizes
PROTOCOL
**Phase 1: Plasma Cohort Selection and Characterization** -- Days 1-14
Obtain IRB-approved pooled plasma from two hybrid immunity cohorts: Delta hybrid immunity (vaccination + Delta infection, n=10 donors) and Omicron BA.1/2 hybrid immunity (vaccination + BA.1 or BA.2 infection, n=10 donors). Collect samples 1-4 months post-Omicron infection. Heat-inactivate at 56°C for 30 minutes. Characterize by measuring total IgG, variant-specific binding antibodies using ELISA with BA.5, BA.1/2, and Delta spike proteins. Perform comprehensive neutralization profiling against multiple variants (Delta, BA.1, BA.2, BA.4, BA.5) using pseudovirus assays on ACE2-expressing cells.
**Phase 2: Cross-Variant Neutralization Analysis** -- Days 15-24
Conduct detailed neutralization mapping using authentic virus strains in BSL-3 facility. Test plasma dilutions from 1:10 to 1:20,480 against SARS-CoV-2 variants including ancestral WA1, Delta, BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5. Use plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) with Vero-E6 cells. Calculate geometric mean titers (GMT) and fold-reductions relative to homologous strain. Perform antigenic cartography analysis to map neutralization landscapes. Validate that both plasma pools show similar BA.5-binding titers but potentially different neutralization breadth.
**Phase 3: Antibody Functional Characterization** -- Days 25-31
Analyze Fc effector functions using flow cytometry-based assays. Measure antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) using NK92-CD16 effector cells and spike-expressing target cells. Assess antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) using THP-1 monocytes and spike-coated beads. Determine complement deposition (CDC) using spike-expressing cells and complement-sufficient serum. Measure antibody avidity using chaotropic elution with increasing urea concentrations (0-8M). Compare functional profiles between the two plasma pools.
**Phase 4: Passive Transfer Optimization** -- Days 32-35
Validate plasma transfer protocol using pilot study with TKI mice. Administer 200 μL plasma intravenously and track circulating human IgG levels by ELISA. Confirm sustained antibody levels (>50 μg/mL) at 24-48 hours post-transfer. Test plasma compatibility with no adverse reactions. Prepare SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 viral stock (titer 10^6 PFU/mL) and verify identity by whole genome sequencing focusing on spike mutations characteristic of BA.5 (L452R, F486V).
**Phase 5: Protection Efficacy Challenge** -- Days 36-42
Randomize 8-10 week old TKI mice into groups (n=12 per group): vehicle control, Delta hybrid plasma, and Omicron BA.1/2 hybrid plasma. Administer plasma 24 hours before challenge. Challenge intranasally with 10^4 PFU SARS-CoV-2 BA.5 under anesthesia. Monitor daily for clinical signs and body weight changes. Include biomarker analysis by collecting small blood samples at 24 and 72 hours post-challenge for inflammatory markers. Sacrifice at 4 days post-infection for viral load assessment.
**Phase 6: Comprehensive Outcome Analysis** -- Days 43-52
Quantify lung viral loads using RT-qPCR (N gene) and plaque assay for infectious virus. Perform immunohistochemistry on lung sections using anti-nucleoprotein antibody to visualize infected cells and quantify infection extent. Analyze lung inflammation by H&E staining and inflammatory cytokine multiplex assay (IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β). Correlate protection with plasma characteristics including variant-specific neutralization, binding avidity, and Fc effector functions. Perform statistical analysis using mixed-effects models to account for repeated measures and multiple comparisons correction.
Source: PMID 40020261 ↗
🧫 Experiment Extras
PATHWAY
Antibody-mediated viral neutralization and clearance
MARKET PRICE
$0.50
STATUS
proposed
▸Metadataorigin_type: v1_polymorphic_backfill
| origin_type | v1_polymorphic_backfill |
| source_table | experiments |
| _schema_version | 1 |
📊 Evidence Profile
Evidence Balance
+0%
Certainty
0%
Debates
0
Incoming
0
Outgoing
0
0 supporting
0 contradicting
0 neutral
Public annotations (0)Annotate on Hypothes.is →
No public annotations yet.