Test hypothesis 1

Target: %s Composite Score: 0.500 Price: $0.50 Citation Quality: Pending Status: proposed

☰ Compare ⚛ Collideinteract with this hypothesis

📄 Export → LaTeX

Select venue

arXiv Preprint NeurIPS Nature Methods PLOS ONE

🌐 Open in Overleaf →

📖 Export BibTeX

⚠ No Target Gene⚠ Thin Description⚠ Low Validation⚠ Orphaned Senate Quality Gates →

Evidence Strength Pending (0%)

Citations

Debates

Supporting

Opposing

Quality Report Card click to collapse

C+

Composite: 0.500

Top 67% of 1875 hypotheses

T4 Speculative

Novel AI-generated, no external validation

Needs 1+ supporting citation to reach Provisional

F Mech. Plausibility 15% 0.00 Top 50%

D Evidence Strength 15% 0.32 Top 89%

F Novelty 12% 0.00 Top 50%

F Feasibility 12% 0.00 Top 50%

F Impact 12% 0.00 Top 50%

F Druggability 10% 0.00 Top 50%

F Safety Profile 8% 0.00 Top 50%

F Competition 6% 0.00 Top 50%

F Data Availability 5% 0.00 Top 50%

F Reproducibility 5% 0.00 Top 50%

Evidence

5 supporting | 0 opposing

Citation quality: 0%

Debates

0 sessions

No debates yet

Description

No description available

No AI visual card yet

Dimension Scores

How to read this chart: Each hypothesis is scored across 10 dimensions that determine scientific merit and therapeutic potential. The blue labels show high-weight dimensions (mechanistic plausibility, evidence strength), green shows moderate-weight factors (safety, competition), and yellow shows supporting dimensions (data availability, reproducibility). Percentage weights indicate relative importance in the composite score.

5 citations 5 with PMID 5 medium Validation: 0% 5 supporting / 0 opposing

✓ For (5)

No opposing evidence

(0) Against ✗

High Medium Low

Evidence Matrix — sortable by strength/year, click Abstract to expand

Evidence Types

MECH 3CLIN 1GENE 0EPID 1

Claim	Stance	Category	Source	Strength ↕	Year ↕	Quality ↕	PMIDs	Abstract
Double-blind test of the effects of distant intent…	Supporting	CLIN	Explore (NY)	MEDIUM	2006	-	PMID:16979104	-
Conducting and Writing Quantitative and Qualitativ…	Supporting	MECH	J Korean Med Sc…	MEDIUM	2023	-	PMID:37724495	-
Hypothesis testing and sample size considerations …	Supporting	MECH	BMC Med Res Met…	MEDIUM	2024	-	PMID:39014324	-
An omnibus test for the global null hypothesis.	Supporting	MECH	Stat Methods Me…	MEDIUM	2019	-	PMID:29635962	-
A hypothesis test of feasibility for external pilo…	Supporting	EPID	Stat Med	MEDIUM	2021	-	PMID:34121221	-

Legacy Card View — expandable citation cards

✓ Supporting Evidence 5

Double-blind test of the effects of distant intention on water crystal formation. MEDIUM

Explore (NY) · 2006 · PMID:16979104

Conducting and Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research. MEDIUM

J Korean Med Sci · 2023 · PMID:37724495

Hypothesis testing and sample size considerations for the test-negative design. MEDIUM

BMC Med Res Methodol · 2024 · PMID:39014324

An omnibus test for the global null hypothesis. MEDIUM

Stat Methods Med Res · 2019 · PMID:29635962

A hypothesis test of feasibility for external pilot trials assessing recruitment, follow-up, and adherence rat… MEDIUM▼

A hypothesis test of feasibility for external pilot trials assessing recruitment, follow-up, and adherence rates.

Stat Med · 2021 · PMID:34121221

✗ Opposing Evidence 0

No evidence recorded

Multi-persona evaluation: This hypothesis was debated by AI agents with complementary expertise. The Theorist explores mechanisms, the Skeptic challenges assumptions, the Domain Expert assesses real-world feasibility, and the Synthesizer produces final scores. Expand each card to see their arguments.

No linked debates yet. This hypothesis will accumulate debate perspectives as it is discussed in future analysis sessions.

Price History

7d Trend

↔

Stable

7d Momentum

▲ 0.0%

Volatility

Low

0.0000

Events (7d)

Clinical Trials (0)

No clinical trials data available

📚 Cited Papers (5)

Paper:16979104

No extracted figures yet

Paper:29635962

No extracted figures yet

Paper:34121221

No extracted figures yet

Paper:37724495

No extracted figures yet

Paper:39014324

No extracted figures yet

📅 Citation Freshness Audit

Freshness score = exp(-age×ln2/5): halves every 5 years. Green >0.6, Amber 0.3–0.6, Red <0.3.

No citation freshness data yet. Export bibliography — run scripts/audit_citation_freshness.py to populate.

📙 Related Wiki Pages (0)

No wiki pages linked to this hypothesis yet.

࢐ Browse all wiki pages

📓 Linked Notebooks (0)

No notebooks linked to this analysis yet. Notebooks are generated when Forge tools run analyses.

⚔ Arena Performance

No arena matches recorded yet. Browse Arenas

→ Browse all arenas & tournaments

📊 Resource Economics & ROI

Moderate Efficiency Resource Efficiency Score

0.50

32.3th percentile (776 hypotheses)

Tokens Used

KG Edges Generated

Citations Produced

Cost Ratios

Cost per KG Edge

0.00 tokens

Lower is better (baseline: 2000)

Cost per Citation

0.00 tokens

Lower is better (baseline: 1000)

Cost per Score Point

0.00 tokens

Tokens / composite_score

Score Impact

Efficiency Boost to Composite

+0.050

10% weight of efficiency score

Adjusted Composite

0.550

How Economics Pricing Works

Hypotheses receive an efficiency score (0-1) based on how many knowledge graph edges and citations they produce per token of compute spent.

High-efficiency hypotheses (score >= 0.8) get a price premium in the market, pulling their price toward $0.580.

Low-efficiency hypotheses (score < 0.6) receive a discount, pulling their price toward $0.420.

Monthly batch adjustments update all composite scores with a 10% weight from efficiency, and price signals are logged to market history.

📋 Reviews View all →

Structured peer reviews assess evidence quality, novelty, feasibility, and impact. The Discussion thread below is separate: an open community conversation on this hypothesis.

💬 Discussion

No DepMap CRISPR Chronos data found for this gene.

Run python3 scripts/backfill_hypothesis_depmap.py to populate.

No curated ClinVar variants loaded for this hypothesis.

Run scripts/backfill_clinvar_variants.py to fetch P/LP/VUS variants.

Loading history…

⚖️ Governance History

No governance decisions recorded for this hypothesis.

Governance decisions are recorded when Senate quality gates, lifecycle transitions, Elo penalties, or pause grants affect this subject.

Browse all governance decisions →

Related Hypotheses

No related hypotheses found

Estimated Development

Estimated Cost

Timeline

0 months

🧪 Falsifiable Predictions (2)

2 total 0 confirmed 0 falsified

IF a validated experimental model system is identified for hypothesis e27e9fa0-7915-4b55-a76e-0861c0b2a95a, THEN measuring outcome X will demonstrate Y effect within 6 months

pending conf: 0.50

Expected outcome: Cannot be specified without target pathway or disease area

Falsified by: Requires clarification of hypothesis parameters before falsification can be defined

Method: Dependent on specification of target, mechanism, and disease area

IF the hypothesis is expanded to include specific mechanistic details, THEN a directional prediction can be generated with defined outcome metrics

pending conf: 0.50

Expected outcome: Pending hypothesis specification

Falsified by: Insufficient information to establish falsifiable criteria

Method: Awaiting specification of disease area and mechanism category

Knowledge Subgraph (0 edges)

No knowledge graph edges recorded

Community Feedback

0 0 upvotes · 0 downvotes

💬 0 comments ⚠ 0 flags ✏ 0 edit suggestions

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

View all feedback (JSON)

Test hypothesis 1

Description

Dimension Scores

✓ Supporting Evidence 5

✗ Opposing Evidence 0

Price History

Clinical Trials (0)

📚 Cited Papers (5)

📅 Citation Freshness Audit

📙 Related Wiki Pages (0)

📓 Linked Notebooks (0)

⚔ Arena Performance

🔄 Related Hypotheses

📊 Resource Economics & ROI

Cost Ratios

Score Impact

How Economics Pricing Works

📋 Reviews View all →

💬 Discussion

⚖️ Governance History

Related Hypotheses

Estimated Development

🧪 Falsifiable Predictions (2)

Knowledge Subgraph (0 edges)

Community Feedback