AD fine-mapping identifies causal variants in microglia-specific enhancers with small credible sets

Target: TREM2 Composite Score: 0.380 Price: $0.50▼20.8% Citation Quality: Pending Alzheimer's disease Status: proposed
☰ Compare⚔ Duel⚛ Collideinteract with this hypothesis
📄 Export → LaTeX
Select venue
arXiv Preprint NeurIPS Nature Methods PLOS ONE
🌐 Open in Overleaf →
📖 Export BibTeX
✓ All Quality Gates Passed
Evidence Strength Pending (0%)
5
Citations
1
Debates
5
Supporting
2
Opposing
Quality Report Card click to collapse
D
Composite: 0.380
Top 83% of 1800 hypotheses
T4 Speculative
Novel AI-generated, no external validation
Needs 1+ supporting citation to reach Provisional
A Mech. Plausibility 15% 0.86 Top 9%
B+ Evidence Strength 15% 0.72 Top 17%
B Novelty 12% 0.68 Top 54%
A Feasibility 12% 0.85 Top 22%
F Impact 12% 0.00 Top 50%
F Druggability 10% 0.00 Top 50%
F Safety Profile 8% 0.00 Top 50%
F Competition 6% 0.00 Top 50%
F Data Availability 5% 0.00 Top 50%
F Reproducibility 5% 0.00 Top 50%
Evidence
5 supporting | 2 opposing
Citation quality: 42%
Debates
2 sessions B+
Avg quality: 0.70
Convergence
0.00 F 30 related hypothesis share this target

From Analysis:

Statistical Fine-Mapping of AD GWAS Loci to Identify Causal Variants

Can Bayesian fine-mapping of the top 25 AD GWAS loci identify credible sets of causal variants with high posterior probability?

→ View full analysis & debate transcript

Description

Bayesian fine-mapping of the top 25 AD GWAS loci will identify credible sets significantly enriched for variants disrupting microglia-specific regulatory elements, reflecting microglial dysfunction as a central AD pathogenic mechanism. Credible sets at loci with known effector genes (APOE, TREM2, PLCG2) will be smaller (<10 variants) due to stronger functional constraints, while novel loci will have larger sets requiring integration with epigenomic data to prioritize causal variants. The highest posterior probability variants will predominantly map to non-coding regulatory regions active in myeloid cells rather than neuronal or astrocytic enhancers.

No AI visual card yet

Curated Mechanism Pathway

Curated pathway diagram from expert analysis

flowchart TD
    A["AD Fine-Mapping
Microglia-Specific Enhancers"] B["TREM2 Causal
Variants Identified"] C["Small Credible Sets
Variant Refinement"] D["Microglial Activation
Phagocytosis Impact"] E["TREM2 Variant
as LOAD Risk Modifier"] F["Enhancer-Based
Therapeutic Targeting"] A --> B B --> C C --> D D --> E E --> F style A fill:#1a237e,stroke:#4fc3f7,color:#4fc3f7 style F fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#a5d6a7,color:#a5d6a7

GTEx v10 Brain Expression

JSON

Median TPM across 13 brain regions for TREM2 from GTEx v10.

Spinal cord cervical c-148.4 Substantia nigra20.7 Hypothalamus10.9 Hippocampus9.8 Amygdala8.9 Caudate basal ganglia7.9 Putamen basal ganglia6.6 Nucleus accumbens basal ganglia6.2 Anterior cingulate cortex BA245.6 Frontal Cortex BA95.1 Cortex3.5 Cerebellar Hemisphere2.9 Cerebellum1.5median TPM (GTEx v10)

Dimension Scores

How to read this chart: Each hypothesis is scored across 10 dimensions that determine scientific merit and therapeutic potential. The blue labels show high-weight dimensions (mechanistic plausibility, evidence strength), green shows moderate-weight factors (safety, competition), and yellow shows supporting dimensions (data availability, reproducibility). Percentage weights indicate relative importance in the composite score.
Mechanistic 0.86 (15%) Evidence 0.72 (15%) Novelty 0.68 (12%) Feasibility 0.85 (12%) Impact 0.00 (12%) Druggability 0.00 (10%) Safety 0.00 (8%) Competition 0.00 (6%) Data Avail. 0.00 (5%) Reproducible 0.00 (5%) KG Connect 0.50 (8%) 0.380 composite
7 citations 7 with PMID 5 medium Validation: 42% 5 supporting / 2 opposing
For (5)
5
No opposing evidence
(2) Against
High Medium Low
High Medium Low
Evidence Matrix — sortable by strength/year, click Abstract to expand
Evidence Types
5
2
MECH 5CLIN 0GENE 2EPID 0
ClaimStanceCategorySourceStrength ↕Year ↕Quality ↕PMIDsAbstract
PubMed PMID 36306735SupportingMECHPubMed MEDIUM--PMID:36306735-
PubMed PMID 33516818SupportingMECHPubMed MEDIUM--PMID:33516818-
PubMed PMID 28602351SupportingMECHPubMed MEDIUM--PMID:28602351-
PubMed PMID 38821351SupportingMECHPubMed MEDIUM--PMID:38821351-
PubMed PMID 32579671SupportingMECHPubMed MEDIUM--PMID:32579671-
Systematic CRISPRi fine-mapping of AD GWAS loci re…OpposingGENE- STRONG--PMID:41427057-
Genetic drivers of Alzheimer's disease progre…OpposingGENE- MODERATE--PMID:41332834-
Legacy Card View — expandable citation cards

Supporting Evidence 5

PubMed PMID 36306735 MEDIUM
PubMed · PMID:36306735
PubMed PMID 33516818 MEDIUM
PubMed · PMID:33516818
PubMed PMID 28602351 MEDIUM
PubMed · PMID:28602351
PubMed PMID 38821351 MEDIUM
PubMed · PMID:38821351
PubMed PMID 32579671 MEDIUM
PubMed · PMID:32579671

Opposing Evidence 2

Systematic CRISPRi fine-mapping of AD GWAS loci reveals heterogeneous causal cell types across loci; multiple … STRONG
Systematic CRISPRi fine-mapping of AD GWAS loci reveals heterogeneous causal cell types across loci; multiple risk genes implicate non-microglial mechanisms including neuronal and oligodendrocyte functions, challenging the prediction that most AD loci harbour microglia-specific enhancer variants
Genetic drivers of Alzheimer's disease progression are largely distinct from disease-risk loci and involve neu… MODERATE
Genetic drivers of Alzheimer's disease progression are largely distinct from disease-risk loci and involve neuronal pathways; this dichotomy suggests that relying on risk GWAS loci to infer microglial-enhancer causality may miss substantial non-microglial genetic architecture
Multi-persona evaluation: This hypothesis was debated by AI agents with complementary expertise. The Theorist explores mechanisms, the Skeptic challenges assumptions, the Domain Expert assesses real-world feasibility, and the Synthesizer produces final scores. Expand each card to see their arguments.
Gap Analysis | 4 rounds | 2026-04-21 | View Analysis
🧬 Theorist Proposes novel mechanisms and generates creative hypotheses

[Error in hypothesis generation: complete() got an unexpected keyword argument 'tools']

🔍 Skeptic Identifies weaknesses, alternative explanations, and methodological concerns

Critical Evaluation of AD Fine-Mapping Hypotheses

Hypothesis 1: Strong LD Enables Narrow Credible Sets

Weaknesses

The fundamental problem with this hypothesis is a category error: strong LD is a hindrance, not a help, for variant-level resolution. When variants are highly correlated, posterior probability diffuses across the LD block, making pinpointing the causal variant statistically harder, not easier. The hypothesis conflates "high statistical power to detect association" with "narrow credible sets."

The APOE/TOMM40 region is particularly problematic as an exemplar. De

🎯 Domain Expert Assesses practical feasibility, druggability, and clinical translation

[Error in expert assessment: complete() got an unexpected keyword argument 'tools']

Synthesizer Integrates perspectives and produces final ranked assessments

{"ranked_hypotheses":[],"synthesis_summary":"Synthesis could not be completed due to errors in receiving inputs from component agents. The Theorist, Skeptic, and Expert modules all returned errors stating 'complete() got an unexpected keyword argument tools', indicating a technical issue with agent invocation. Without validated hypotheses, critique, or feasibility assessments, no ranking or synthesis can be produced. Please verify the agent configuration and retry the generation pipeline.","knowledge_edges":[]}

Price History

0.460.570.68 0.78 0.36 2026-04-222026-04-252026-04-27 Market PriceScoreevidencedebate 7 events
7d Trend
Rising
7d Momentum
▼ 20.8%
Volatility
High
0.3855
Events (7d)
7

Clinical Trials (0)

No clinical trials data available

📚 Cited Papers (7)

No extracted figures yet
No extracted figures yet
TREM2, microglia, and Alzheimer's disease.
Mech Ageing Dev (2021) · PMID:33516818
No extracted figures yet
No extracted figures yet
Microglia and TREM2.
Neuropharmacology (2024) · PMID:38821351
No extracted figures yet
No extracted figures yet
No extracted figures yet

📅 Citation Freshness Audit

Freshness score = exp(-age×ln2/5): halves every 5 years. Green >0.6, Amber 0.3–0.6, Red <0.3.

No citation freshness data yet. Export bibliography — run scripts/audit_citation_freshness.py to populate.

📙 Related Wiki Pages (0)

No wiki pages linked to this hypothesis yet.

࢐ Browse all wiki pages

⚔ Arena Performance

No arena matches recorded yet. Browse Arenas
→ Browse all arenas & tournaments

📊 Resource Economics & ROI

Moderate Efficiency Resource Efficiency Score
0.50
32.3th percentile (776 hypotheses)
Tokens Used
0
KG Edges Generated
0
Citations Produced
5

Cost Ratios

Cost per KG Edge
0.00 tokens
Lower is better (baseline: 2000)
Cost per Citation
0.00 tokens
Lower is better (baseline: 1000)
Cost per Score Point
0.00 tokens
Tokens / composite_score

Score Impact

Efficiency Boost to Composite
+0.050
10% weight of efficiency score
Adjusted Composite
0.430

How Economics Pricing Works

Hypotheses receive an efficiency score (0-1) based on how many knowledge graph edges and citations they produce per token of compute spent.

High-efficiency hypotheses (score >= 0.8) get a price premium in the market, pulling their price toward $0.580.

Low-efficiency hypotheses (score < 0.6) receive a discount, pulling their price toward $0.420.

Monthly batch adjustments update all composite scores with a 10% weight from efficiency, and price signals are logged to market history.

📋 Reviews View all →

Structured peer reviews assess evidence quality, novelty, feasibility, and impact. The Discussion thread below is separate: an open community conversation on this hypothesis.

💬 Discussion

No DepMap CRISPR Chronos data found for TREM2.

Run python3 scripts/backfill_hypothesis_depmap.py to populate.

No curated ClinVar variants loaded for this hypothesis.

Run scripts/backfill_clinvar_variants.py to fetch P/LP/VUS variants.

🔍 Search ClinVar for TREM2 →
Loading history…

⚖️ Governance History

No governance decisions recorded for this hypothesis.

Governance decisions are recorded when Senate quality gates, lifecycle transitions, Elo penalties, or pause grants affect this subject.

Browse all governance decisions →

Related Hypotheses

H1: TREM2 Agonism to Redirect APOE4-Enhanced Microglia from Synapse Pruning to Amyloid Clearance
Score: 0.921 | neurodegeneration
TREM2-Mediated Astrocyte-Microglia Cross-Talk in Neurodegeneration
Score: 0.907 | neurodegeneration
TREM2-Mediated Astrocyte-Microglia Crosstalk in Neurodegeneration
Score: 0.892 | neurodegeneration
TREM2-Mediated Microglial Dysfunction Disrupts Perivascular Tau Clearance
Score: 0.861 | neuroscience
Microglial Senescence Prevention via TREM2/SASP Axis
Score: 0.837 | neurodegeneration

Estimated Development

Estimated Cost
$0
Timeline
0 months

🧪 Falsifiable Predictions (2)

2 total 0 confirmed 0 falsified
IF Bayesian fine-mapping is performed on the top 25 AD GWAS loci using multi-ancestry summary statistics and high-resolution microglia ATAC-seq chromatin accessibility data, THEN the credible set variants at these loci will show significant enrichment (OR > 2.0, p < 0.001) for disruption of microglia-specific enhancers compared to null expectations from permuted genomic backgrounds within 6 months of analysis completion.
pending conf: 0.78
Expected outcome: At least 18 of 25 loci (72%) will show enrichment scores for microglia-specific enhancer disruption > 2 standard deviations above genomic background null distribution; combined meta-analysis Fisher's exact test p-value < 1×10⁻⁶ for overrepresentation of myeloid-active regulatory variants.
Falsified by: Enrichment OR ≤ 1.0 or p > 0.05 for microglia-specific enhancer disruption among credible set variants; OR < 1.5 if nominally significant; or fewer than 12 of 25 loci showing any directional enrichment in microglia chromatin.
Method: Bayesian fine-mapping (SuSiE, CAVIAR, or FINEMAP) on N=1,126,523 AD cases/controls from PGC-ALZ, Regeneron, and UK Biobank cohorts, integrated with snATAC-seq from >50,000 microglia nuclei (AMP-AD, Banner, ROSMAP cohorts) and H3K27ac HiChIP contact maps from sorted human monocytes.
IF credible set sizes are compared between the three known effector gene loci (APOE, TREM2, PLCG2) and the remaining 22 novel AD loci after Bayesian fine-mapping, THEN the median 95% credible set at effector gene loci will contain <10 variants while novel loci will have median sets >25 variants (Mann-Whitney U p < 0.001) within 6 months of analysis completion.
pending conf: 0.72
Expected outcome: Mean 95% credible set size at APOE/TREM2/PLCG2 = 6.3 variants (range 3-9); mean 95% credible set size at novel loci = 31.7 variants (range 18-89); ratio of novel/effector set sizes > 3.5; at least 2 of 3 effector loci reducing to ≤5 variants when integrating microglia Hi-C loops.
Falsified by: No significant size difference (p > 0.05) between effector and novel loci credible sets; median effector gene credible set size ≥15 variants; or >50% of known effector loci showing credible sets larger than the median novel locus set.
Method: Comparative analysis of 95% credible sets from SuSiE fine-mapping pipeline applied uniformly across 25 AD loci, stratified by prior evidence for effector gene candidacy (genomic annotations, eQTL colocalization, rare variant burden); bootstrapped 95% CI for set size distributions calculated from 1000 resamples.

Knowledge Subgraph (0 edges)

No knowledge graph edges recorded

3D Protein Structure

🧬 TREM2 — PDB 6YXY Click to expand 3D viewer

Experimental structure from RCSB PDB | Powered by Mol* | Rotate: click+drag | Zoom: scroll | Reset: right-click

Source Analysis

Statistical Fine-Mapping of AD GWAS Loci to Identify Causal Variants

neurodegeneration | 2026-04-16 | completed

Community Feedback

0 0 upvotes · 0 downvotes
💬 0 comments ⚠ 0 flags ✏ 0 edit suggestions

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

View all feedback (JSON)

Public annotations (0)Annotate on Hypothes.is →
No public annotations yet.