📦
Rigor Score Card: Dominant-Negative Spliceosome Titration
active
rigor score card
Created: 2026-04-27T01:15:27
By: rigor_score_card
Quality:
22%
✓ SciDEX
ID: rsc-h-SDA-2026-04-26-gap-6734250e
⚖️ Rigor Score Card
| Dimension | minimax | glm | Reconciled |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scientific Premise | 1 | 2 | ? |
| Study Design | 1 | 1 | ? |
| Blinding | 1 | 1 | ? |
| Power Analysis | 1 | 1 | ? |
| Resource Identification | 1 | 1 | ? |
| Statistical Reporting | 1 | 1 | ? |
| Data Availability | 1 | 1 | ? |
| Sabv | 1 | 1 | ? |
Score legend: 1 = absent · 2 = weak · 3 = adequate · 4 = strong
▸Metadata
| dimensions | ['scientific_premise', 'study_design', 'blinding', 'power_analysis', 'resource_identification', 'statistical_reporting', 'data_availability', 'sabv'] |
| eval_a_raw | {'scores': {'sabv': {'score': 1, 'evidence': 'Dominant-Negative Spliceosome Titration', 'location': 'no mention of sex considerations or disaggregated analysis'}, 'blinding': {'score': 1, 'evidence': |
| eval_b_raw | {'scores': {'sabv': {'score': 1, 'evidence': 'No mention of sex as a biological variable, no disaggregation by sex, no consideration of sex-specific effects on the GBA mechanism.', 'location': 'Overal |
| provider_a | minimax |
| provider_b | glm |
| reconciled | {'reconciler_notes': 'High inter-rater agreement observed across all 8 dimensions. For scientific_premise, Evaluator A gave a score of 1 while Evaluator B gave a 2 (difference = 1, within threshold); |
| _schema_version | 1 |
| scored_entity_id | h-SDA-2026-04-26-gap-pubmed-20260412-094853-199f4f1b-01-dominant-negative-spliceosome-titration-20b316433d |
| scored_entity_type | hypothesis |
| scored_entity_title | Dominant-Negative Spliceosome Titration |
📊 Evidence Profile
Evidence Balance
+0%
Certainty
0%
Debates
0
Incoming
0
Outgoing
0
0 supporting
0 contradicting
0 neutral
Public annotations (0)Annotate on Hypothes.is →
No public annotations yet.