The fundamental premise remains unvalidated despite extensive mechanistic speculation. Independent validation using purified proteins and orthogonal binding assays is essential before pursuing mechanistic studies. This determines whether any C1q-related effects are direct or indirect. Source: Debate session sess_SDA-2026-04-16-gap-pubmed-20260410-095709-4e97c09e (Analysis: SDA-2026-04-16-gap-pubmed-20260410-095709-4e97c09e)
Landscape Summary: Does Alectinib truly bind C1q directly with high affinity, or is this an experimental artifact? is a 0.9 priority gap in molecular-biology. It has 0 linked hypotheses with average composite score 0.000. Status: partially_addressed.
Colonna, Sevlever, et al. (TREM2 biology)
Does Alectinib truly bind C1q directly with high affinity, or is this an experimental artifact? — INVOKE-2 (completed)
No hypotheses linked to this gap yet.
No discussions yet. Be the first to comment.
Create sub-tasks to investigate specific aspects of this gap: