🔬

Analysis Proposal: ANGPT1 -> PDGFRB [co_discussed]

active
analysis proposal Created: 2026-04-27T23:45:35 By: analysis_proposal_generator Quality: 50% ✓ SciDEX ID: analysis_proposal-cf3a97d5-15c6-4eaa-87b
Analysis Proposal
Analysis Question
Can we validate the co-discussed relationship between ANGPT1 and PDGFRB in neurodegeneration contexts?
Datasets
Brainspan developmental transcriptome (Allen Brain Atlas)Mayo Clinic LOAD RNA-seq dataset (syn2589203)Accelerating Medicines Partnership Alzheimer's Disease AMP-AD knowledge portal
Methods
Pearson correlation of normalized RNA-seq expression in prefrontal cortex and hippocampus across LOAD cases vs. controlsSTRING-db protein-protein interaction score extraction with confidence threshold ≥0.7Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) against KEGG vascular smooth muscle contraction and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways
Expected Outputs
  • Significant positive correlation (r > 0.3, p < 0.05) in disease-relevant brain regions would support biological relevance of co-discussion
  • Physical interaction evidence ( STRING confidence ≥0.7 ) or shared pathway membership would provide mechanistic plausibility
  • Absence of correlation across independent cohorts would refute the relationship and flag the edge as spurious literature co-occurrence
Related Entities
ANGPT1PDGFRB
Metadata
_origin{'url': None, 'type': 'internal', 'tracked_at': '2026-04-28T06:45:35.943362'}
methods['Pearson correlation of normalized RNA-seq expression in prefrontal cortex and hippocampus across LOAD cases vs. controls', 'STRING-db protein-protein interaction score extraction with confidence thr
datasets['Brainspan developmental transcriptome (Allen Brain Atlas)', 'Mayo Clinic LOAD RNA-seq dataset (syn2589203)', "Accelerating Medicines Partnership Alzheimer's Disease AMP-AD knowledge portal"]
edge_count1
source_entityANGPT1
target_entityPDGFRB
edge_signature["ANGPT1|PDGFRB|co_discussed"]
_schema_version1
confidence_range[0.4, 0.4]
expected_outputs['Significant positive correlation (r > 0.3, p < 0.05) in disease-relevant brain regions would support biological relevance of co-discussion', 'Physical interaction evidence ( STRING confidence ≥0.7 )
source_relations['co_discussed']
analysis_questionCan we validate the co-discussed relationship between ANGPT1 and PDGFRB in neurodegeneration contexts?
📊 Evidence Profile
Evidence Balance
+0%
Certainty
0%
Debates
0
Incoming
0
Outgoing
3
0 supporting 0 contradicting 0 neutral
View full evidence profile →
Public annotations (0)Annotate on Hypothes.is →
No public annotations yet.