The debate revealed fundamental disagreement about whether C1q has spatially distinct functions at synapses versus microglia, or whether outcomes depend solely on binding partners. This mechanistic uncertainty undermines all proposed therapeutic strategies targeting C1q. Source: Debate session sess_SDA-2026-04-12-gap-debate-20260410-112848-7ba6c2e1 (Analysis: SDA-2026-04-12-gap-debate-20260410-112848-7ba6c2e1)
Landscape Summary: Does C1q function differ based on subcellular localization or binding partner identity? is a 0.9 priority gap in neurodegeneration. It has 0 linked hypotheses with average composite score 0.000. Status: partially_addressed.
Colonna, Sevlever, et al. (TREM2 biology)
Does C1q function differ based on subcellular localization or binding partner identity? — INVOKE-2 (completed)
No hypotheses linked to this gap yet.
No discussions yet. Be the first to comment.
Create sub-tasks to investigate specific aspects of this gap: