ID: h-e27562cbb4
Hypothesis

A-to-I RNA editing modulates the lncRNA-0021 binding site and tunes mmu-miR-6361 selectivity

ADAR-dependent editing could strengthen or weaken a pre-existing miR-6361 site by altering local pairing potential or RNA structure.
🧬 ADAR1/ADAR2🩺 molecular-neurobiology🎯 Composite 39%💱 $0.47▲21.7%proposed
molecular neurobiology
EvidencePending (0%)📖 0 cit🗣 1 debates 3 support 2 oppose
✓ All Quality Gates Passed
Mechanistic 0.38 (15%) Evidence 0.29 (15%) Novelty 0.64 (12%) Feasibility 0.46 (12%) Impact 0.34 (12%) Druggability 0.32 (10%) Safety 0.24 (8%) Competition 0.56 (6%) Data Avail. 0.27 (5%) Reproducible 0.39 (5%) KG Connect 0.50 (8%) 0.387 composite

🧪 Overview

ADAR-dependent editing could strengthen or weaken a pre-existing miR-6361 site by altering local pairing potential or RNA structure. The debate supports this as a plausible modifier of interaction strength, but not as the primary determinant of baseline specificity unless editing at the relevant adenosines is directly demonstrated.

🧬 Mechanism

🧬 Curated Mechanism Pathway

Curated pathway from expert analysis

flowchart TD
    A["ADAR1/ADAR2<br/>Hypothesis Target"]
    B["Pathway Dysregulation<br/>Cited Mechanism"]
    C["Cellular Response<br/>Stress or Clearance Change"]
    D["Neural Circuit Effect<br/>Synapse/Glia Vulnerability"]
    E["AD<br/>Disease-Relevant Outcome"]
    A --> B
    B --> C
    C --> D
    D --> E
    style A fill:#1a237e,stroke:#4fc3f7,color:#4fc3f7
    style B fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#ef9a9a,color:#ef9a9a
    style E fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#ef9a9a,color:#ef9a9a

⚖️ Evidence

⚖️ Evidence Matrix3 supports2 contradicts
Supports
ADAR editing can regulate lncRNA-miRNA interactions in neural tissues.
Supports
A-to-I changes can alter miRNA-target binding kinetics and site usage.
Supports
ADAR perturbation changes neural ceRNA network behavior in vivo.
Contradicts
There is no direct evidence that lncRNA-0021 is edited at the relevant site, and most such interactions do not require editing to exist.
Contradicts
As framed, editing could either enhance or impair binding, making it a weak primary hypothesis unless narrowed to a specific edited nucleotide.
📖 Linked Papers

No linked papers recorded for this hypothesis yet.

🏥 Translation

🧬 3D Protein Structure — ADAR1

No curated PDB or AlphaFold mapping for ADAR1 yet. Search RCSB →

💉 Clinical Trials

No clinical trials data linked to this hypothesis yet.

No curated ClinVar variants loaded for this hypothesis.

Run scripts/backfill_clinvar_variants.py to fetch P/LP/VUS variants.

🔍 Search ClinVar for ADAR1 →

No DepMap CRISPR Chronos data found for ADAR1.

Run python3 scripts/backfill_hypothesis_depmap.py to populate.

💰 Estimated Development
Cost
$0
Timeline

🏆 Tournament

🏆 Arenas / Elo

No arena matches recorded yet. Browse Arenas →

📊 Market Indicators

7d Trend
Rising
7d Momentum
▲ 1.1%
Volatility
Medium
0.0202
Events (7d)
3
Price History
▲21.7%

💾 Resource Usage

LLM Tokens
11,368
$0.0341
Total Cost
$0.0341

🔮 Predictions

🔎 Predictions vs Observations2 predictions · 0 with recorded observations
PredictionPredictedObservedStatusConf
IF ADAR1 and ADAR2 are simultaneously knocked down using siRNA in primary mouse cortical neurons, THEN the expression of a miR-6361 target reporter construct will increase by at least 2-fold relative At least 2-fold upregulation of luciferase activity from a reporter containing the miR-6361 binding site from lncRNA-0021, indicating reduced competition for mi— no observation —pending0.55
IF the A-to-I editing site at position 247 of lncRNA-0021 is reverted to unmodified adenosine (A247) via site-directed mutagenesis in N2A cells, THEN mmu-miR-6361 binding affinity will decrease by at Decreased miR-6361 binding affinity (≥30% reduction) to the unedited lncRNA-0021 A247 variant relative to the edited construct, as measured by RNA immunoprecipi— no observation —pending0.65
🔮 Falsifiable Predictions (2)
pendingconf 65%
IF the A-to-I editing site at position 247 of lncRNA-0021 is reverted to unmodified adenosine (A247) via site-directed mutagenesis in N2A cells, THEN mmu-miR-6361 binding affinity will decrease by at least 30% compared to the edited variant within 72 hours post-transfection.
Predicted outcome: Decreased miR-6361 binding affinity (≥30% reduction) to the unedited lncRNA-0021 A247 variant relative to the edited construct, as measured by RNA imm
Falsification: No significant difference (<10% change) in miR-6361 binding affinity between the edited (I247) and unedited (A247) lncRNA-0021 variants would disprove this prediction and indicate editing is not a pri
pendingconf 55%
IF ADAR1 and ADAR2 are simultaneously knocked down using siRNA in primary mouse cortical neurons, THEN the expression of a miR-6361 target reporter construct will increase by at least 2-fold relative to scrambled siRNA controls within 96 hours post-transfection.
Predicted outcome: At least 2-fold upregulation of luciferase activity from a reporter containing the miR-6361 binding site from lncRNA-0021, indicating reduced competit
Falsification: No significant change (<1.2-fold) in reporter activity following ADAR1/2 double knockdown would disprove this prediction and indicate that ADAR-mediated editing does not modulate miR-6361 bioavailabil
Metadatasource: v1_phase_c_backfill · origin_type: debate_synthesizer
sourcev1_phase_c_backfill
origin_typedebate_synthesizer
_schema_version1
📊 Evidence Profile
Evidence Balance
+0%
Certainty
0%
Debates
0
Incoming
0
Outgoing
0
0 supporting 0 contradicting 0 neutral
Public annotations (0)Annotate on Hypothes.is →
No public annotations yet.